Like one of the comments said on that article, they are basically proposing a rolling release schedule.
I don't see what difference it would make to what they currently do, with releases every 6-months and updates in between. In my experience, issues with any new release were sorted out in a matter of months, sometimes not even that long.
Also, how is this guy a "former Ubuntu person", when the articles states this: "Former Ubuntu Developer Manager and now member of the Ubuntu Technical Board", that tells me he is still an "Ubuntu person", just is now involved differently?.
Heh, just saw <?php?>'s post, most stable version of Ubuntu I ever ran was 9.04, especially compared to 9.10, which almost drove me away from Ubuntu. However, I agree with <?php?>, will stick with Ubuntu regardless of what they do, still remains my favourite to this day. Since 10.10, have decided I will update only once a year, so my next update will be with 11.10, or at least, once the version of Ultimate Edition with 11.10 is released.
B
B