It's called being in business to make money..... unpopular definitions lead to less sales.Yeah, they changed the meaning of racism to sell dictionaries....![]()
It's called being in business to make money..... unpopular definitions lead to less sales.Yeah, they changed the meaning of racism to sell dictionaries....![]()
It's called being in business to make money.....
Just because it seems silly to you does not mean it does not happen. Many current dictionaries have nonsense terms in them because they are in popular use..... does not mean the terms have actual merit however.![]()
![]()
This reminds me of the Monty Python sketch where the guy won't buy the British bird book because of it having certain birds he doesn't like....except your theory is even more silly.
Isn't that how language and communication works...?Just because it seems silly to you does not mean it does not happen. Many current dictionaries have nonsense terms in them because they are in popular use..... does not mean the terms have actual merit however.
No it's one of the ways it works.... the technical term when it is with intent being semantic warfare. It has been used on and since the beginning of civilization and recently (relatively) started in earnest with the marxists in order to subversively reprogram societal thinking.Isn't that how language and communication works...?
White people were also slaves.They are linked though, do you think attitudes to black people in the South magically changed when they lost the civil war? Or do you think the continued racism of the South in the decades after was informed by the attitudes that thought that black people were less than human and deserved to be slaves? How can any white person justify owning slaves without being a racist? Slavery is one of the effects of racism...
"Black people are inferior/sub-human therefore I should be able to own them and profit off them"
When slavery ended the racism manifested itself in other ways..
Non-of those would have come about if white people in the South thought that black people were no different to white people.
How many white people were killed by black people this year?How many black people where lynched by the KKK 100 years after slavery ended? But yeah the end of slavery ended all racism![]()
I acknowledged that slavery wasn't only aimed at black people later in the thread, however,there there weren't any white slaves in the US as far as I know...White people were also slaves.
In the US, no clue...How many white people were killed by black people this year?
Indentured servitudeI acknowledged that slavery wasn't only aimed at black people later in the thread, however,there there weren't any white slaves in the US as far as I know...
British North America being the key word there, was any of that white slave labour legal after the United States became an independant country?Indentured servitude
Main articles: Indentured servitude and Irish indentured servants
In the modern era, many whites in England, Ireland and British North America were indentured servants, a form of slavery now banned by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Between 50 and 67 percent of white immigrants to the American colonies, from the 1630s and American Revolution, had traveled under indenture.[49]
How is that key? You're throwing up arbitrary complaints.British North America being the key word there, was any of that white slave labour legal after the United States became an independant country?
Am sure you regard the decleration of independance as arbitrary but most people consider it pretty important. It's key because it goes to the fact that the US, for all the talk about equality, initially regarded blacks as inferior...How is that key? You're throwing up arbitrary complaints.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed "
The 1705 slave law in Virginia made it illegal to “whip a christian white servant naked, without an order from a justice of the peace
No such law protected black bodies. In fact, the same law state that should “any slave resist his master … correcting such slave, and shall happen to be killed in such correction, it shall not be accounted felony.” This was a license to kill. And of course even if said slave were not dead, he or she could not sue because he or she was not legally allowed to provide testimony in court.
Oh, okay; I thought maybe you had an issue with slavery because of the real consequences suffered by the descendants of slaves, but I see actually you're just here to moan and gripe because it serves your political platform.Am sure you regard the decleration of independance as arbitrary but most people consider it pretty important. It's key because it goes to the fact that the US, for all the talk about equality, initially regarded blacks as inferior...
The declaration of independence said the following...
Troll elsewhere Xarog.Oh, okay; I thought maybe you had an issue with slavery because of the real consequences suffered by the descendants of slaves, but I see actually you're just here to moan and gripe because it serves your political platform.
Nah, your agenda is pretty clear cut, so it might as well be called out for what it is.Troll elsewhere Xarog.
And just btw, prejudice isn't prejudice if it turns out the judgement is true. For example, noticing that the population groups have different average IQ scores and therefore that certain populations will perform better than other populations in a competitive setting does not make one racist, even though technically it works out to a belief that one racial group is superior to another.You can't just decide for words to mean what you want them to mean though... The generally accepted definition regardless of liberal or conservative is ..
I checked a few sources and they are all say much the same thing...
The idea that this is some kind of new liberal definition is a little bit silly...
Do you have a reputable source that reflects your definition?
The problem there is the ethno-centric thinking that leads to the wrong conclusions as to why the differences exist and the assumption that they are permanent.And just btw, prejudice isn't prejudice if it turns out the judgement is true. For example, noticing that the population groups have different average IQ scores and therefore that certain populations will perform better than other populations in a competitive setting does not make one racist, even though technically it works out to a belief that one racial group is superior to another.