Which company offers the best Gap Cover based on experience / claims history?
Im currently with Sirago , looking at changing as they have way too many limits imposed
So I've got only a vague idea of how this works ... can somebody please explain how frequently gap cover is necessary?
I'm with Discovery and I just figured there shouldn't be any 'gap' to cover. Have people specifically had need of gap cover with Discovery?
My example is as follows: Discovery feels that a gastroscopy is something that a doctor can do in his rooms, and it is not necessary to do it in a hospital. My wife had it done in a day hospital, therefore there is a co-payment to be made by the member. The entire claim was processed from the in-hospital portion of the plan instead of the savings. Anyways, I claimed for the co-payment which was about 3k and they covered it.
Gf works at a Netcare dealing with exactly this sort of stuff, routinely processes 80-100k co-payments... And Discovery is shyte unless you're on the top tier apparently
I (maybe naively) have believed that Discovery strikes deals with certain hospitals and doctors 'in their network', to afford their clients care without copayments. Isn't it only when you 'push the boundaries' - e.g. have cases which aren't typically covered by medical insurance, claim very regularly, or go to a special hospital or doctor without first obtaining Discovery's authorization, that you pick up the biggest copayments?
Nope they have limits they're willing to pay for any procedure, just as an example their back/neck surgery limit is 50k(for whatever specific package), last week an elderly man needed 2 new prosthetic disks that were 100 and something k, had to pay the shortfall
You know, I don't see the gap cover providers being run like a charity, so where is their catch? I doubt that they're going to sign a blank cheque effectively, promising to cover whatever gap - no matter how high it might be - exists, so wouldn't it be better (and even cheaper) sometimes to pay for a more expensive medical aid (with higher limits), rather than a cheaper one and a separate gap cover (with its own limits)?
They're honest questions, I've got no clue. So far I've just been going on faith as a young and relatively healthy guy, but I'm going to have to start reading the fine print more closely.
You know, I don't see the gap cover providers being run like a charity, so where is their catch? I doubt that they're going to sign a blank cheque effectively, promising to cover whatever gap - no matter how high it might be - exists, so wouldn't it be better (and even cheaper) sometimes to pay for a more expensive medical aid (with higher limits), rather than a cheaper one and a separate gap cover (with its own limits)?
They're honest questions, I've got no clue. So far I've just been going on faith as a young and relatively healthy guy, but I'm going to have to start reading the fine print more closely.
Did you know…
100% Medical aid cover MAY NOT COVER 100% of your doctors’ bills.
100% Cover is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM that a doctor would charge, not the maximum.
What is Gap Cover?
Gap cover fills the gap between what is covered by your Medical Aid, and the actual amount charged by your medical practitioner for in-hospital procedures.
Since 2009 almost every doctor in every SA private practice charges MORE than 100% for almost every procedure, therefore you will probably receive an extra bill every time you are hospitalised if you only have 100% medical aid cover.