Okay I missed that.
But it was still a legal warrent for her arrest, it was proberly issued because she failed to show up in court.
The officers involved more than likely had a stack of warrents to execute and these vary from really simple to really dangerous.
We usually travel as a group and do one warrent at a time.
I think the main issue here should be the detention of her child, not the number or appearence of the officers doing the arrest.
When doing warrents you dont take chances
Understandable, but what reason do they have to lie about taking the child?