Google Pixel 5 + 4a 5g

Not getting much love.

Weekly poll results: the Pixel 5 faces an uphill battle, the Pixel 4a 5G headed for disappointment

Last week’s poll shows that there is not much enthusiasm for the two latest Google phones. The reasons why are pretty varied, though some did find things to love about the new models.

First, let’s get this out of the way – Google’s limited distribution network means that even if you want one, Pixels just might not be available in your country. This has been the case for years and Google has shown little desire to fix the situation.

The most popular option in the poll suggests that the 2020 Pixels are not worth your money. The most common reason is just that – money. The Pixel 5 is just too expensive for many (more so in the US where mmWave support drives up the price).

You can buy a Samsung Galaxy S20 FE for that kind of money and those who reject the FE over its size point to the Sony Xperia 5 II (though that one is a good deal more expensive). There’s also the new iPhone coming next week, that should cost around the same as the Google phone.


104E8195-CCC2-4F2B-A2A1-BBAE2CFCC1F0.jpeg
 
Why get a Pixel when you can get a OnePlus which gets like 5 years instead of 3 years of software support?

Also mid range chipset for $599/699 and punch hole camera? Rather get a OnePlus 7T, 7 Pro or 7T Pro for less.
 
A real shame there's no Pixel 5 XL. This thing is tiny.
 
Pixel 5 gets mediocre 120 points in DxOMark test

Google Pixel 5’s main camera uses the Sony IMX363 – the same sensor that the Pixel 3 and 4 used. And it’s lacking the Pixel Neural Core as apparently the Snapdragon 765G has enough processing power to handle the Google algorithms that are behind the success of the Pixel cameras.

Still, there’s only so much that can be done given the old hardware and lack of a third camera – there’s no zoom camera this time (last year, it was the ultra wide cam that was MIA). DxOMark gave the phone an overall score of 120, an improvement over the previous generation but not enough to get it out of the mid-field.

The Photo score of 129 is middle of the road performance, with the camera getting praise for producing photos with nice detail and texture, pleasant colors and accurate autofocus. However, low light performance was just okay and there’s noise visible even in daylight photos.


EF64384E-C35A-4BA9-BA61-734CFEE3B925.jpeg
 
Worth it to buy from Connected Devices?
The Pixel 5 is on there for R17299 and the normal Pixel 4a is R10399.
Obviously it is a bit more expensive but then again you dont have to deal with customs etc.
Is it worth it to go this route?
 

Google Pixel 5's chipset is actually even slower than we initially thought


Google's flagships have usually had a tad less performance than their direct rivals, with the first gen using a down-clocked Snapdragon 821, while the Pixel 4 generation missed on the plus version of the Snapdragon 855 and used the original version. This year the Pixel 5took things further by going for the mid-range Snapdragon 765G and it turns out that's not even the entire story. It turns out that the chipset actually doesn't deliver nearly as much processing power as its 765 peers.

During our review, we actually requested another Google Pixel 5 phone as we suspected the first unit was faulty. However, the second unit only came to confirm our findings. Here's the just of it.

In single-core CPU tests, the Snapdragon 765G inside the Google Pixel 5 seems to be doing just fine, delivering the performance we expected it to. But when its multi-core scores and GPU test are way behind. In fact, it's much closer to the Snapdragon 710 in terms of raw performance.

We also decided to rule out thermal throttling as the issue because, so we tried cooling the device while running benchmarks, but that made no difference whatsoever.

 

Google Pixel 5's chipset is actually even slower than we initially thought


Google's flagships have usually had a tad less performance than their direct rivals, with the first gen using a down-clocked Snapdragon 821, while the Pixel 4 generation missed on the plus version of the Snapdragon 855 and used the original version. This year the Pixel 5took things further by going for the mid-range Snapdragon 765G and it turns out that's not even the entire story. It turns out that the chipset actually doesn't deliver nearly as much processing power as its 765 peers.

During our review, we actually requested another Google Pixel 5 phone as we suspected the first unit was faulty. However, the second unit only came to confirm our findings. Here's the just of it.

In single-core CPU tests, the Snapdragon 765G inside the Google Pixel 5 seems to be doing just fine, delivering the performance we expected it to. But when its multi-core scores and GPU test are way behind. In fact, it's much closer to the Snapdragon 710 in terms of raw performance.

We also decided to rule out thermal throttling as the issue because, so we tried cooling the device while running benchmarks, but that made no difference whatsoever.

Yeah I saw on some benchmarks even the normal 4a scored more than the 5 with the 4a 5G having the largest score.
 
Yeah I saw on some benchmarks even the normal 4a scored more than the 5 with the 4a 5G having the largest score.
Long story short,Google Pixel camera are the best cameras ever

Regardless of new tech in Samsung and Apple for a long time

You can not compare with google pixel phone

Take the latest version of I phone 12 and google pixel 4 there is large variance in terms of camera quality
 
Ordered one on Amazon, should arrive next week.
I'm thinking about getting one. I'm hoping the $459.00 deal is still around next week. I'd be interested to hear about your experience with it when it arrives.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter