Not really, a dog will never be able to predict the motion of a planet using a first principle like Newtonian gravity.
Because the theory of multiple intelligences is BS. There isn't cooking intelligence or feminist-belly-button-lint-picking intelligence.
As I have repeatedly told you, intelligence, as measured by the IQ test, measures how quickly you can learn a complex task. The evidence for this, is that people we consider to be highly intelligent have good understanding of multiple unrelated fields.
The question is why do we regard them as intelligent? It is because they are able to be highly effective at learning across very different domains of knowledge and skill. Normal computers are not intelligent in this regard as they are only ridiculously effective at solving problems that are set about in a very specific way.
Most of psychology is rubbish.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223/
IQ is one of the few spots where it is possible to replicate results.