- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 66,740
He did however point out that it is possible that local viewers may be able to get HDTV coverage through satellite services, but that this issue is still under discussion. By 2010 there should also be various new pay-TV operators in South Africa which may bring HDTV to local consumers.
this is like producing a fine wine in south africa, but being unable to sample it.
Does dstv have the capacity to stream HD?Precisely, but thats always the way its been in this country AND theres no guarantee ppl like No-Choice have the satellite bandwidth to stream HD
Does dstv have the capacity to stream HD?
Is any country in the world getting all their broadcasts at a minimum of 720p?At a minimum, we should be getting our broadcasts in 720p, or even 1080i, and in widescreen. 'Nuff said.
It's no use MultiChoice bringing out future decoders with DVI / HDMI outputs when there's no HD content.
Considering many of their broadcasts are of inferior quality to the 350mb downloads available perhaps they should consider getting rid of some of those ever so important channels - say perhaps the high 70's and the entire 90's range and improve things elsewhere.Nope...
That would be huge news if it was the case.
As for No-Choice having the capacity to stream HD, given the codec they use, I don't think so. But I do know the stream SOME stuff (usually sports) in Widescreen
Agreed - scrap the odd number supersports channels and give me widescreen - I'm tired of everyone having a J-Lo sized butt!I definately agree with you on that... anything after 71 in the 70's range.. and anything from 90 onwards should just be axed in my opinion. Couple of other channels that could be done without in my opinion.. aka 23...