capetownguy
Expert Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 3,206
If that constitutes your response to my argument, then I'm not wasting any more time on you.
Join the growing club.
If that constitutes your response to my argument, then I'm not wasting any more time on you.
To continue the debate, I think you should start providing links to reliable sources, and without that I'd just consider it rantings of someone with a personal grudge.
I have several issues with your argument.How did I personalise anything? You painted Helen Zille with your opinion, and harbour a lot of bitterness toowards her because your cushy neighbourhood isn't being put ahead of a township and you're not getting a response to your email. We're all subsidising township dwellers in this country. It's called redistribution of wealth. So what?
Remember that responding to "hate mail" from you is not included in that promise.If Zille's council cannot answer an e-mail for months and months, and sometimes years, then why do they say they will? Helen Zille is prime culprit, though she will BOLDLY write in the newspaper that she answers ALL her correspondence diligently. This is a blatant LIE.
Why does the council have a policy that promises a response withing 24Hrs if they never intend to follow through?
Since it wasn't hate mail and your statement is pure conjecture + others have complained openly about the same issue, we can safely say you're just trolling.Remember that responding to "hate mail" from you is not included in that promise.
Do you read what I type or is your motivation purely to stalk and answer every post I make with some or other nasty personal attack. Bored? Underworked?What exactly is your argument Sackboy ? other than ranting at Zille and how you feel the world should be different?