Fulcrum29
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2010
- Messages
- 55,031
Opinion article published in 2020, not going to quote the whole article, but only the conclusion,
www.news24.com
OPINION | DF Malan's bust is gone, now the school needs to change its name, too | News24
DF Malan is not just a name. It is not just a name in the same way that Cecil John Rhodes and Jan van Riebeeck are not just names, <strong>writes Willem Muller<strong>.
OPINION | DF Malan's bust is gone, now the school needs to change its name, too
...
I suggest the name DF Malan, proudly displayed on two walls of the school facing public roads, is a place-holder that allows people to project ideas they endorse but cannot articulate in respectable society. When the name falls, I hold, questions about the militarism, emphasis on discipline, regressive nature of critical discourse, and institutional and unconstitutional Christian dogma endorsed by the school, all come to the fore.
This is evident in the paradoxical nature of the argument that if the name truly "means nothing", as is often asserted by those opposed to a name change, it should be unproblematic to change it (as has happened with so many other schools named after National Party grandees, and with not a few public buildings named after DF Malan). The very fact that an argument for keeping the name exists, means that it does mean something, that there is something worth arguing for. The reasons for wanting the name are becoming increasingly evident to the world outside the palisade fence of DFM in comment sections as the issue gains social traction. Perhaps not surprisingly, these reasons veer between alt-right hate speech and profanity.
In response to the movement DF Malan Must Fall on Instagram, the official response by the school states that they do not want to have this particular conversation on social media. When I attended the school, they also didn't wish to have it as a conversation between pupils and teachers.

