ShloshMalosh
Expert Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4,447
Hows this car on reliability and running costs?2010 Land Rover Freelander sd4
230000km
Thanks
Hows this car on reliability and running costs?2010 Land Rover Freelander sd4
230000km
It is paid off, so only paying to fix a few things here and there.Hows this car on reliability and running costs?
Thanks
It is paid off, so only paying to fix a few things here and there.
Mechanically still very good.
I import by own spares, which means a 50+% saving on what the dealers quote, even after import duties.
Currently only paying for fuel (8l/100km long distance and 10l/km short trips).
Services are every 24000km, but taking it for an oil service every 12000km.
Normal services are not expensive (around R3k), depending if they need to replace any other parts.
It also seems they are not the most reliable, a friend of mine has one in mint condition giving him endless issues, do you have any experience on them?Thanks, I'm considering an SUV because ironicaly, the wife and i want to take more road trips.
So we want comfort, space, and the ability to go on dirt roads but not serious 4x4-ing.
Lots of freelander 2's around the R120- R140K mark
no experience owning SUV'sIt also seems they are not the most reliable, a friend of mine has one in mint condition giving him endless issues, do you have any experience on them?
I meant Landover and the Freelander in particular.no experience owning SUV's
But i did grow up drivng my dad's Nissan Hardbody 3.0 DC and before that a 2.4 Hi-Rider
So "riding high" is something im farmiliar with. And something Id like to return to
The Freelander 2 have minimal issues.I meant Landover and the Freelander in particular.
im hearing the same from going to googlethuThe Freelander 2 have minimal issues.
Freelander 1 have plenty of issues, as is best to avoid.
I won't comment on the rest of the LR offerings.
It's a heavy car, no idea why they had the 2.0l option, even the 2.4 is still not up to the task. I do appreciate the solid workmanship though, it was made to last.I have a Honda CR-V. Great car, but lacks power on the 2.0 NA one. Also, parts are VERY expensive.
Yep, that's why I'm holding on to it for dear life. Even if the dealers want R4k just to replace the handbrake shoes in the drums at the back. R4k. For pads.It's a heavy car, no idea why they had the 2.0l option, even the 2.4 is still not up to the task. I do appreciate the solid workmanship though, it was made to last.
Why go to the dealers, they rip just about everyone off, no matter the make or model?Yep, that's why I'm holding on to it for dear life. Even if the dealers want R4k just to replace the handbrake shoes in the drums at the back. R4k. For pads.
Because finding parts for a Honda at other spares is a mission, when you do find the part the likelihood of ending up with the wrong part is very real since it seems like Honda has made sure that it creates as much confusion as possible around the models and parts.Why go to the dealers, they rip just about everyone off, no matter the make or model?
Yep, that's why I'm holding on to it for dear life. Even if the dealers want R4k just to replace the handbrake shoes in the drums at the back. R4k. For pads.
Because finding parts for a Honda at other spares is a mission, when you do find the part the likelihood of ending up with the wrong part is very real since it seems like Honda has made sure that it creates as much confusion as possible around the models and parts.
A friend has the CRV and he looked for the rear brakes all over Joburg, if they are available somewhere they cost an arm and a leg because the spare shops knows the prices from Honda, they already know you are desperate when you come looking for something.