Indeed, valid concerns are often hypothesis before they occur. If you can't demonstrate why the hypothesis is unreasonable, then we're done here because I've got everything I came for.
Nonsense.
That was Brenda Cossman, apologies.
I didn't say it was unreasonable, I said that it did nothing to rebut the possibility Brown laid out.
The Ifs have all been validated with practical examples given the nature of the authority of the HRC and the powers that it can impose upon people who refuse to acknowledge its authority to impose sanctions such as mandatory corrective education and the like, and the Can't doesn't actually forbid it.
And the can'ts have so far been validated by zero court cases, fines or imprisonment for the matter.
Nonsense.
And yet the concern is still valid, which is what you came in here to dispute in the first place. So thanks for admitting that your criticism of Peterson was premature.
Took 25 years for the HRC to become an enemy of an open and non-racial democracy. You're arbitrarily cherry picking time frames with no reason given for the choice.
Sure, it may be a fact, but that fact validates nothing.
And I've laid out in exactly the way Peterson's concerns are validated by using a local example of how this sort of situation goes pear shaped. You have yet to explain what is wrong with this comparison because each time you just stick your head in the sand and pretend that it can't exist.
Lindsay Shepard anyone?
Sorry to rain on your parade, but a probability is still a valid concern. So your efforts in this thread is worth zilch.
Sure, it may be a fact, but that fact validates nothing.
And I've laid out in exactly the way Peterson's concerns are validated by using a local example of how this sort of situation goes pear shaped. You have yet to explain what is wrong with this comparison because each time you just stick your head in the sand and pretend that it can't exist.
Actually, the original claim said that there were legal implications. You narrowing it down to jail is a straw man, as it turns out.'Hundreds' of young trans people seeking help to return to original sex
I was assigned female at birth You are not assigned your gender at birth*. You are either a male or a female. Only takes one look. That's not part of a 3rd leg there. *Medically there are some people born with both or obscure genitalia, in which case a medical decision needs to be made. In this...mybroadband.co.za
Lindsay Shepard anyone?
Sorry to rain on your parade, but a probability is still a valid concern. So your efforts in this thread is worth zilch.
An irrelevant fact remains irrelevant.
"Justin Trudeau"Who the hell knows where half of the delusions that go on in your head really come from.
If you are so worried about this probability despite its un-liklehood, how do you sleep at night, when its more probable that you could get hit by lightning.An irrelevant fact remains irrelevant.
Who the hell knows where half of the delusions that go on in your head really come from.
Since it seems I was too subtle before: Tell that to the beauticians that discriminated against Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv. I'm sure it will soar like a lead balloon. Some lost their businesses, their livelihoods because they did not want to
Ironically for you I was very vocal against that idiot.
Loses the argument, switches to allegations of bigotry.
That is why I came in here in the first place. The article is literal fake news and even confirms that in its own article, then the echo chamber that justified bigotry because, oh look at the danger of misgendering trans people.Loses the argument, switches to allegations of bigotry.
When government forces people to accept lies it is a problem.Oh NOES!!! This is the very living end!!! Burn down the country! They are genociding my gender pronouns!!! This is what the book of Revelations was all about!!! They calling errbody errbody up in here!!! END TIMES! MAGA!
...morons.
Sign up with Google
