Tokolotshe
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Messages
- 12,219
Right.I am just raising this here again.
This study:
![]()
Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria
Purpose In on-line forums, parents have reported that their children seemed to experience a sudden or rapid onset of gender dysphoria, appearing for the first time during puberty or even after its completion. Parents describe that the onset of gender dysphoria seemed to occur in the context of...journals.plos.org
Was pulled because:
![]()
As a Former Dean of Harvard Medical School, I Question Brown’s Failure to Defend Lisa Littman
This week’s controversy surrounding an academic paper on gender dysphoria published by Brown University assistant professor Lisa Littman—brought on by the post-publication questioning of Dr Littman’s scholarship by both the journal that published it, PLOS One, and Brown’s own School of Public...quillette.com
No one is saying that improving acceptance and tolerance towards people who suffer from this is wrong. Creating tolerance is sure something that is in dire need across the entirety of our society. However, approaching this issue with only that goal in mind is counter productive, and (imo) extremely harmful.
In this woke world it is perfectly safe to go press your ear against a red hot stove plate. There is no common sense or no studies that are at least peer reviewed twenty times to say it's not. So it must be safe? So, some bloke that read a study somewhere is now an expert and trumps life's experience. Sounds good?Increasingly, research on politically charged topics is subject to indiscriminate attack on social media, which in turn can pressure school administrators to subvert established norms regarding the protection of free academic inquiry. What’s needed is a campaign to mobilize the academic community to protect our ability to conduct and communicate such research, whether or not the methods and conclusions provoke controversy or even outrage.
I would have had no problem with this if somebody wanted to do stupid, except these theories gets forced down our throats while the jury is still out and nobody knows what the hell they are really talking about. The WHO issue you mention is a case in point. Yet that is used as a building block in further stupid arguments - this thread being a case in point.
Common sense has become pretty uncommon and unfashionable. Of course everything not on the side of the extreme left is extreme right, even if centrist. There is no middle ground for this lot.
Common sense and traditional wisdom says "Anything not in moderation is bad". Hey, let's circle jerk style peer reviewed studies to disprove that!?
Yet this is what we see in daily life, no matter how destructive it is, who or what it destroys. The results matters not, the narrative is all important.