This all begs the question. If people believe that Gender Dysphoria should be treated as an ailment in need of medical intervention, can or should it not be construed that gay/lesbian should also be treated as a medical condition? Obviously I don't believe this, but isn't this a slippery slope?
I'm actually curious about this, but it would never be studied with any honesty.
There was an article I read a few weeks ago in which they tried to look for the "gay gene". In other words, a biological thing that makes you more likely to be gay. What they found is that there is no one specific gene that makes you gay, and for those that influence it, their influence is small. Which is not surprising, but what is surprising is that they think a gay gene exists at all.
If it was hereditary in any way, I'd expect it to have been bred out ages ago. Think about it - yes, gay people can have children, but not as many as straight people. Normally gay people have children because they are still in the closet and need to fit in. But even those that do, will have less children than people who just enjoy a good old fashioned naai. Over the thousands of years that humans have been civilised, this should mean that a gay gene, if it exists, would be far less prevalent.
If being gay was found to be a social/upbringing thing, what then? My guess is that the powers that be do not want this studied because they do not want the possibility of somebody saying that gay people can be cured.
Now, I don't think that gay people are morally deficient or bad in any way. But, I wonder if some of them would prefer a straight lifestyle if they could choose to be straight.