irBosOtter
Expert Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,872
Once a terrorist always a terrorist
Am well aware.It was a general thing, they used necklaces not as actual punishment but as implements of terror to literally scare up support.
you were not oppressed and instead were beneficiary of others' oppression so it's very easy for you to sit on your high horse and pontificate and prescribe how exactly the weak being oppressed by the full might of the state should respond. You and other denialists live in cloud cuckoo-land, there's no element of reality in your outlook.So the people who were being systematically killed just decided to become killers of innocents themselves... and in so doing became the very thing that they despised and were fighting against. Instead of rising above, they chose to stoop down to the same level, and thereby proved that they were actually no better and no different. There are no winners in war. Just lots of dead people.
And the ANC... once they had a taste for blood... allowed that thirst for vengeance to continue on AFTER the democratic elections, and it has now turned our nation into one of the bloodiest on the planet.
Yes, I am defending this.So, guilt by association - by that rationale any wife or child of anyone working for the apartheid government would have been a legitimate (not innocent) target? What actual crime did they commit that is deserving of murder?
Are you really trying to defend this?
The same can be said for the so called black diamonds, wealth built on legalized theft and oppression.you were not oppressed and instead were beneficiary of others' oppression so it's very easy for you to sit on your high horse and pontificate and prescribe how exactly the weak being oppressed by the full might of the state should respond. You and other denialists live in cloud cuckoo-land, there's no element of reality in your outlook.
you were not oppressed and instead were beneficiary of others' oppression so it's very easy for you to sit on your high horse and pontificate and prescribe how exactly the weak being oppressed by the full might of the state should respond. You and other denialists live in cloud cuckoo-land, there's no element of reality in your outlook.
Hahahaha are you MyBroadbanders real people living in South Africa or you are just online personas?The same can be said for the so called black diamonds, wealth built on legalized theft and oppression.
You are either putting on an act or have no idea the trouble brewing outside of your little protected bubble.Hahahaha are you MyBroadbanders real people living in South Africa or you are just online personas?![]()
Yes, I am defending this.
The ANC and the PAC took it even further. They indiscriminately killed civilians whether they were associated with the government or not. Look at the Magoos Bar bomb, Amanzimtoti bomb, the Church street bomb, the many Wimpy bombs the Sterland bomb and the St George's church massacre. All of them targeted civilians.
Schoon was actively involved in the war effort in Angola, she was teaching Cuban soldiers English in order to help them in the fight against South African forces.
She was a legitimate target and the TRC agreed. It was reckless of her to have her children in a war zone.
We agree on that at least...Everything has two sides. While I am prepared to let bygones be bygones, many others on this forum would rather believe fake news than accept that it was a terrible time in our history which we should do everything in our power to prevent from happening again.
you were not oppressed and instead were beneficiary of others' oppression so it's very easy for you to sit on your high horse and pontificate and prescribe how exactly the weak being oppressed by the full might of the state should respond. You and other denialists live in cloud cuckoo-land, there's no element of reality in your outlook.
fahk me, someone phone up Janusz Waluś, he should never have gone to prison!?!McBride was sentenced to death and spent time on death row, he was released from prison in 1992 after the conclusion that his acts were politically motivated
fahk me, someone phone up Janusz Waluś, he should never have gone to prison!?!
Though I don't disagree with you there is a big difference, the NP did it in secret and no one defends it unless.... let's not go there.I never disputed that the ANC and PAC did reprehensible things, I take issue with the idea that gets thrown around here that the Apartheid government were somehow above such things as targeted executions and the murder of innocent people ...
Which is the same as what the Axis did? Or did you forget the Blitz? The bombing of Warsaw? Yes Dresden was pretty destructive and the allies didn't need to drop that many incendiary bombs.So, exactly the same as most of what the allies bombed during WW2.
It's all the same.
What you want to do is debate the end justifying the means, and leave emotion out of it.
Hiroshima? Nagasaki?Which is the same as what the Axis did? Or did you forget the Blitz? The bombing of Warsaw? Yes Dresden was pretty destructive and the allies didn't need to drop that many incendiary bombs.
Tokyo? Combined more civilians were killed in that bombing than Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Bombing against Germany totalled 400k but both sides bombed the hell out of each other.Hiroshima? Nagasaki?
Though I don't disagree with you there is a big difference, the NP did it in secret and no one defends it unless.... let's not go there.
Letter bombs though is nothing in comparison to their bigger counter parts made SPECIFICALLY to target innocents
and everyone defends them as part of the "glorious struggle". Both sides committed terrorism yes but the scale is tipped massively towards the revolutionaries in terms of actual atrocity. Even that would be fine would it not be for the continued defense as legitimate warfare but attack the NP actions for being worse somehow.
You cannot directly compare letter bombs with car bombs without being disingenuous, you don't seem to be doing that at least.