Pitbull
Verboten
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
- Messages
- 64,307
Why do you think that is?
It is a new strain so that strain has been around for 3 months.Wow okay you've honestly got no idea about diseases.
Influenza aka the flu are a family of viruses, there are many many different strains.
Coronaviruses are a family of viruses, there are many many different strains. CoV SARS2 notice the 2, which means it's a sequel, as there was a 1 which was called MERS.
It's not new, it's a new strain that's all. That's why they figured out what it was in a few days, unlike other new viruses that takes months to years.
The rest of my post says so. Or did you not read it. Answer that.Why do you think that is?
Wow okay you've honestly got no idea about diseases.
Yes and guess what happens with influenza, new strains come and go. Hence why you need a new flu vaccine every year.It is a new strain so that strain has been around for 3 months.
Daily percentage increase has been going down so that's not true.
But the absolute number hasn't been doing down. Stuck at 3500. Also, we don't know if Italy has hit its testing capacity.
So the annual number of deaths you like to conflate the subject with.Yes and guess what happens with influenza, new strains come and go. Hence why you need a new flu vaccine every year.
600 000, not 60 000. Also if it was spreading like wildfire why are there only 194 729 cases since December 2019. That's almost 4 months world wide, while 36 million have had influenza in the US alone, with 370k hospitalised and 22000 deaths in the US alone.You have to be living with your head in the sand to think that COVID-19 is the equivalent of the flu. While the flu kills 0.2-0.6% of people who catch it, this coronavirus is hitting 4-8% while also spreading like wildfire. So while "60,000" people who die from the flu in a year sounds like a relatively big number, its nothing if COVID-19 isn't brought under control. We could go into millions of deaths, which is hard for some people to fathom, I know.
The reason for the extreme measures is per some of the above posts on 'leveling' the spread out/slowing it down. All this does is enable goverments to actually cope with the number of people who are being affected and reduce the overall number of people who are dieng. As it stands place like Italy will run out of beds, equipment etc. and have to make a call on who they treat.
None of this is rocket science.
Currently it seems the US is being hit by both A and BSo the annual number of deaths you like to conflate the subject with.
Break those up per strain.
perhaps there will be more remote work now
Will be very difficult to convince them to come back.That is going to be an interesting discussion in a months time. If you can keep your productivity up, I wonder how the bosses are going to take it or convince people to come back to the office.
The best thing will be the end to those motherfckrs who have meetings to have a meeting and plan the next meeting. Yes France, I am looking at you.That is going to be an interesting discussion in a months time. If you can keep your productivity up, I wonder how the bosses are going to take it or convince people to come back to the office.
The rest of my post says so. Or did you not read it. Answer that.
600 000, not 60 000. Also if it was spreading like wildfire why are there only 194 729 cases since December 2019. That's almost 4 months world wide, while 36 million have had influenza in the US alone, with 370k hospitalised and 22000 deaths in the US alone.
So how is this disease spreading faster if one country has had more infections and deaths in the same time period?
US, UK coronavirus strategies shifted following UK epidemiologists' ominous report
A study by UK epidemiologists predicts that attempts to slow, or mitigate -- rather than actively halt, or suppress -- the novel coronavirus could overwhelm the number of intensive care hospital beds and lead to about 250,000 deaths in the UK and more than a million in the United States during the course of the current pandemic.
![]()
US, UK coronavirus strategies shifted following UK epidemiologists' ominous report
A study by UK epidemiologists predicts that attempts to slow, or mitigate -- rather than actively halt, or suppress -- the novel coronavirus could overwhelm the number of intensive care hospital beds and lead to about 250,000 deaths in the UK and more than a million in the United States during...edition.cnn.com
fck me![]()
Would be cool, cause a lot of jobs don't need to be in the office 40 hours a week.That is going to be an interesting discussion in a months time. If you can keep your productivity up, I wonder how the bosses are going to take it or convince people to come back to the office.