International COVID-19 Updates & Discussion 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brawler

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
11,472
If you take into account that those that got vaccinated first were older (UK has a big older pop) and vulnerable (comorbidities), it could make sense.

The unvaccinated group was 88% <50 years old where the vaccinated group was around 50% <50 years old.

No one <50 years old died after 2 doses.
 

Markd

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
1,677
If you take into account that those that got vaccinated first were older (UK has a big older pop) and vulnerable (comorbidities), it could make sense.

The unvaccinated group was 88% <50 years old where the vaccinated group was around 50% <50 years old.

No one <50 years old died after 2 doses.

exactly. Who are the people in the UK who have not been vaccinated? the most likely people to not die. Just having some data isn't enough anymore - we need the data behind the data to know what we're dealing with.

Have you guys considered this or are you just latching on to the data that suits your narrative?
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
exactly. Who are the people in the UK who have not been vaccinated? the most likely people to not die. Just having some data isn't enough anymore - we need the data behind the data to know what we're dealing with.

Have you guys considered this or are you just latching on to the data that suits your narrative?
Yup another example of someone skim reading a document, not bothering to check on context or purpose, then sucking a few numbers and coming up BS.
 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,482
If you take into account that those that got vaccinated first were older (UK has a big older pop) and vulnerable (comorbidities), it could make sense.

The unvaccinated group was 88% <50 years old where the vaccinated group was around 50% <50 years old.

No one <50 years old died after 2 doses.
The end result is that Delta looks dangerous for the >50, but inconsequential for the <50. Vaccinated or otherwise. So do other variants.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
History has shown that every pandemic will run its course”.

Wow, what an astounding statement.

Singapore effectively declares by decree, that Covid 19 after vaccination is now just another flu.
 

flytek

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
1,747
Isn't it exactly that? A new flu (coronavirus) invading a population with zero immunity and killing 0.5%
After which time vaccines and immunity will ensure it kills less and less each year.
The original flu is also know to kill the weak or those that let it go to far and then die from pneumonia etc.
One of my best friends dad died of flu at 40 years old about 25 years ago. Didn't take it seriously and didn't make it.
 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,482
Wow, what an astounding statement.

Singapore effectively declares by decree, that Covid 19 after vaccination is now just another flu.
Whatever happened to the poster child of the pandemic. What a travesty!!

It's just a flu bro!!!!
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,976
Isn't it exactly that? A new flu (coronavirus) invading a population with zero immunity and killing 0.5%
After which time vaccines and immunity will ensure it kills less and less each year.
The original flu is also know to kill the weak or those that let it go to far and then die from pneumonia etc.
One of my best friends dad died of flu at 40 years old about 25 years ago. Didn't take it seriously and didn't make it.
This, this is what I'm trying to get people to understand the flu isn't the common cold, the flu can still kill you, yet every year we have a season about 11000 people die in the flu season every year but it's fine its only the flu. We also don't count every single person, or death the same with the flu it could be higher or lower
 

Azg

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,213
Whatever happened to the poster child of the pandemic. What a travesty!!

It's just a flu bro!!!!
Lol. The Singaporeans said, “We can’t eradicate it, but we can turn the pandemic into something much less threatening, like influenza or chickenpox, and get on with our lives,”. Implying that without effective vaccines / medicines it is something much more threatening than the flu.
I am surprised you didn't choose to say "it's just chickenpox bro", since they also mentioned that.

The plan is based on the effectiveness of vaccines leading to milder symptoms, reduced hospitalizations and deaths. As far as I can tell that is what the whole world is aiming for (e.g. look at Europe opening up for the Euros based on vaccination).

The Singapore plan also includes:
- Mandatory vaccinations. Booster shots
- You may need to take tests to head to the shops or go to work.
- Easier and quicker test kits. “In time, the airport, seaport, office buildings, malls, hospitals and educational institutions can use these kits to screen staff and visitors.”

None of those measures imply that it is "just a flu."
 

Nod

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 22, 2005
Messages
10,057
Source: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm
Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
If these figures were recorded for a new drug undergoing trials, would that drug be approved for use?
Yes? Then what is the problem?
No? Then why are these vaccines being accepted for use?
If the answer is "we have no choice" then why are repurposed drugs with the same or better results also not being accepted?

Or are these losses being written off by big pharma and governments as "collateral damage"?
 
Last edited:

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,482

Lol. The Singaporeans said, “We can’t eradicate it, but we can turn the pandemic into something much less threatening, like influenza or chickenpox, and get on with our lives,”. Implying that without effective vaccines / medicines it is something much more threatening than the flu.
I am surprised you didn't choose to say "it's just chickenpox bro", since they also mentioned that.

The plan is based on the effectiveness of vaccines leading to milder symptoms, reduced hospitalizations and deaths. As far as I can tell that is what the whole world is aiming for (e.g. look at Europe opening up for the Euros based on vaccination).

The Singapore plan also includes:
- Mandatory vaccinations. Booster shots
- You may need to take tests to head to the shops or go to work.
- Easier and quicker test kits. “In time, the airport, seaport, office buildings, malls, hospitals and educational institutions can use these kits to screen staff and visitors.”

None of those measures imply that it is "just a flu."
LOL, misunderstood completely, but never mind.

The point I was making was that the nation that promoted some of the most restrictive lockdowns and was praised for it is the first to turn around to say, we can't get rid of it, let's try and live with it (like the flu).

Which is what some of us here have been saying since the beginning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top