International COVID-19 Updates & Discussion 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

noxibox

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
23,338
Beautiful in its simplicity: relative risk reduction due to vaccines perhaps a statistical anomaly?

Illusion
Well there must be a delay. You can't compare deaths this week against the total vaccinated this week. You'd probably need a four week difference - two weeks until the vaccine is effective plus two weeks from infection to death.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Well there must be a delay. You can't compare deaths this week against the total vaccinated this week. You'd probably need a four week difference - two weeks until the vaccine is effective plus two weeks from infection to death.
It is not about accounting for the delay per see, it is about understanding the maths and the possible issues that might arise because of a failure to properly account for the tie differences IF the delays are not allowed for!

Thie data collection issues at the start of this whole fiasco showed just how many incorrect conclusions were drawn because data was not properly synchronised
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,699
A rather gloomy article but likely correct.


Some key points:

And it points to the fact that even if everybody were to be vaccinated, there’s the risk that the pandemic would still pose a problem — at least to the elderly or otherwise vulnerable.

In the meantime, for politicians, the pandemic’s resurgence presents an unwelcome balancing act.

An ECDC overview of studies about restrictions, including masking and lockdowns in Europe (which has yet to be peer-reviewed), notes a catch-22: These measures work best when implemented early — but also when they have solid backing from the public. That means officials are stuck with the challenging task of convincing people to take new precautions even when things aren’t that bad.

Ultimately, even in a place as heavily vaccinated as Portugal, it’s still too early to predict when life will return to something resembling the old normal, said Rebeiro.

“Living in uncertainty for such a long period of time is certainly difficult for all of us,” she said, “but we must keep observing precaution.”

For political leaders, the risk is that public opinion will mutate even faster than the virus.
 

SubtleBeast

Expert Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
1,833

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Funny enough. Reports suggest Delta imploded in Japan. Only one source though. We'll have to wait a few days/weeks for updates on this.
Edit: forget about the video's description. A good watch.

Sounds like a good watch.
But of course, the anti-IVM idiots would simply reject everything else in the video as soon as they see it even remotely suggests that IVM may have a use in treating Covid 19.

But it is not the only source of the information listed. I looked into what going on in Japan, as soon as the report came in about the lifting of restrictions on accessing IVM. (August 2021)

1. Out of that came the remarkable "coincidence" ( I do not believe in coincidences) that the relaxation of access to IVM resulted in a turnaround of cases 12 - 14 days later.

2 Then reports coming in that IVM might not explain the turnaround because of the discovery of the NSP 14 error-correcting protein issue that leads to the virus "destroying itself" (Read all the theories as to why the other SARS viruses appear to have simply disappeared).

3. Then the documentation of a defence enzyme found in Asian populations (APOBEC3A) which apparently attacks RNA viruses.

Only the completely stupid do not keep their minds open to all possibilities and new findings.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,534
The vaccines were originally sold and defended based on the trials outcomes. You just can't make yourself admit that the original numbers were out and your only hope is to cling to the current severe illness and death prevention.

Could you point out anywhere where Pfizer (or any vaccine maker) claimed that their vaccine would give 100% protection globally?
 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,486
Could you point out anywhere where Pfizer (or any vaccine maker) claimed that their vaccine would give 100% protection globally?
Monday, November 09, 2020 - 06:45am
Vaccine candidate was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first interim efficacy analysis
The first interim analysis of our global Phase 3 study provides evidence that a vaccine may effectively prevent COVID-19. This is a victory for innovation, science and a global collaborative effort,” said Prof. Ugur Sahin, BioNTech co-founder and CEO. “When we embarked on this journey 10 months ago this is what we aspired to achieve.
And so it continued from there on. All of a sudden, it's not about infections, nor about preventing covid, nor has the vaccine ever been designed that way??

Another goalpost?
 

Mephisto_Helix

Resident Postwhore
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
29,723
And they achieved that effectiveness ...... when that was developed and rolled out there was no Delta variant to make the efficacy wane. Hence the booster you guys are all so afraid off and reeeing about.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
And they achieved that effectiveness ...... when that was developed and rolled out there was no Delta variant to make the efficacy wane. Hence the booster you guys are all so afraid off and reeeing about.
There is zero proof that the vaccine effectiveness is waning just because of the data variant, as much as you and others' would like to believe that is true.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,534


And so it continued from there on. All of a sudden, it's not about infections, nor about preventing covid, nor has the vaccine ever been designed that way??

Another goalpost?

FYI

Your quotes don't say anything about being 100% effective for everyone...

B13A4425-CFB7-4FC9-B3BA-BA3B7DAACD21.jpeg
 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,486

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,486
@Dave - in your haste to contradict me and to defend your "new normal reality", you missed the original post
Care to explain how they are not working according to how pro-vaxxers expected?

With some quotes to explain what was said, compared to what is not working?
What was said was "vaccines are effective against covid infection". And now it's not working.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,534
@Dave - in your haste to contradict me and to defend your "new normal reality", you missed the original post
What was said was "vaccines are effective against covid infection". And now it's not working.

Vaccines are effective against Covid infection, Paul, but as has been said, they are not 100% effective, why would you think otherwise?
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
@Dave - in your haste to contradict me and to defend your "new normal reality", you missed the original post
What was said was "vaccines are effective against covid infection". And now it's not working.
But they are effective against infection.

Not 100%, but they never claimed they were 100% effective.

 

Paulsie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
5,486
But they are effective against infection.

Not 100%, but they never claimed they were 100% effective.

Why don't you reference an article from before August 2021? You might get even higher than 50-60% as proof of your claim. :ROFL: :ROFL:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top