Yes,off to a good start,though irrelevant when talking vaccines?
No fear,it's not a novel concept though as claimed by your peers. "Need"? It helps,not sure how that's evading your sensibilities
Again,relevance when talking vaccines?
Um,alright? Thought you as a human would grasp things are never 100% certain,predictions are optimistic based on available data,like "Omicron taking over and becoming the flu"
Did you personally ask a relevant virologist for a confidence %? Or you just listening to TV and shaking your head when the data changes?
And again,relevance when talking vaccines?
As things do
Lockdowns have been confirmed to help
And again,relevance when talking vaccines?
Also shown to help
And again,relevance when talking vaccines?
Vaccines again are proven to be beneficial,nobody claimed 100% prevention ever
Vaccines again are proven to be beneficial,nobody claimed 100% prevention ever
Vaccines again are proven to be beneficial,nobody claimed 100% prevention ever
Vaccines again are proven to be beneficial,nobody claimed 100% prevention ever
Polio relevance again,boosters are not a new thing
Polio relevance again,boosters are not a new thing
Polio relevance again,boosters are not a new thing
Polio relevance again,boosters are not a new thing
Compared to non-novel viruses,each has similarities warranting comparisons,seems you don't understand how comparisons work?
And again,relevance when talking vaccines?
Doesn't know what a "proper" vaccine is,but predicts one would be made at some point. Pick 3 of the current vaccines people receive to exhibit this "proper" vaccine,and your criteria to determine this,let's see if it passes mustard
You discredited yourself pretty well,no need for anybody else to do it
So let's summarize,you don't know how vaccines work,and it shows,but somehow
comparing to polio is the problem?

hilarious