AntiThesis
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2005
- Messages
- 5,583
Saw that, was not at all surprised by the 'boogying' [I think that was the word used] & prostitutes [why else hotel rooms?].What fascinated me most was the perception (I had) that these hijackings were taken place to put food on hungry folk's plate...quite the contrary, these guys were out partying with their loot and blowing it....not that it changes what trauma people experience going through a hijacking.
Would you have sympathised if theye were "putting food on the table"?Saw that, was not at all surprised by the 'boogying' [I think that was the word used] & prostitutes [why else hotel rooms?].
How many hijackers [violent & heartless by definition] actually go home to families and put food on the table...
Would you have sympathised if theye were "putting food on the table"?
Why do you ask? - Am I obliged to sympathise with a self confessed murderer? - Do you suggest that it is reasonable and just that a person's life is worth less than a loaf of bread?Would you have sympathised if theye were "putting food on the table"?Saw that, was not at all surprised by the 'boogying' [I think that was the word used] & prostitutes [why else hotel rooms?].
How many hijackers [violent & heartless by definition] actually go home to families and put food on the table...
whether it's for bread on the table or armani shoes, it doesn't make a difference. It is wrong.
You seemed to be condemning what the loot was being used for rather than the act itself, but I get you position after your other post.Why do you ask? - Am I obliged to sympathise with a self confessed murderer? - Do you suggest that it is reasonable and just that a person's life is worth less than a loaf of bread?
*sigh*
1. Prominent leaders in this country list abject poverty as the reason for the high crime rate in this country.
Ahhh, you mean the conclusion I drew about the 'ladies' actually being prostitutes when combined with the hotels that Jabu mentioned? - that was an incidental conclusion, but in no way a justification [or empathication] for committing murder even if it had resulted in a family being fed...You seemed to be condemning what the loot was being used for rather than the act itself, but I get you position after your other post.Why do you ask? - Am I obliged to sympathise with a self confessed murderer? - Do you suggest that it is reasonable and just that a person's life is worth less than a loaf of bread?
This Carte Blanche clip is very good as it shows that, despite common thought, these savages do it to live the high life like their gang dealers. Putting food on the table? Ha! They go for Armani shoes, Levi jeans and Nike tops. A typical African way of thinking isn't it?
Well Jabu did say that hijackers compete with one another in terms of clothing and status symbols, and Jabu specifically stated that hijackers do not compete for hijacking turf or territory...I don't think that's a particularly valid statement. I'd prefer to think of it as typically human thinking.
Unlike many desperate hijackers, Jabu had a bursary for a B.Com, and a promising career lay ahead. But the glamorous lifestyle and the respect shown to successful car thieves lured him into a life of crime.