IS better latency to Google.com via Satellite

[kilos]

New response times down from 685-714ms (1 August) down to 490ms
New traceroute with Business 512 Satellite - used the same www.google.com
IP address from my 1st August posting
Can anyone explain, has IS installed more bandwidth

traceroute to 64.233.161.104 (64.233.161.104), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 196.211.2.xxx 1.654 ms 1.036 ms 1.377 ms
2 196.211.129.13 49.678 ms 57.503 ms 62.280 ms
3 196.36.80.209 64.666 ms 69.393 ms 68.696 ms
4 cdsl2-rba.isdsl.net (196.36.80.162) 71.595 ms 71.846 ms 75.112 ms
5 196.36.80.165 78.340 ms 81.967 ms 85.358 ms
6 168.210.250.81 645.819 ms 644.988 ms 648.783 ms
7 168.210.250.80 660.136 ms 667.620 ms 666.197 ms
8 168.209.244.7 460.725 ms 463.789 ms 468.690 ms IMPROVEMENT
9 core1-0-2-0.lga.net.google.com (198.32.160.130) 468.508 ms 471.726 ms 471.142 ms
10 216.239.49.34 476.001 ms 478.464 ms 490.169 ms
11 66.249.94.235 488.869 ms 506.368 ms 511.019 ms
12 72.14.238.232 468.441 ms 468.029 ms 473.167 ms
13 72.14.236.200 478.738 ms 477.935 ms 72.14.236.202 483.109 ms
14 216.239.48.190 487.196 ms 487.345 ms 491.562 ms
15 64.233.161.104 490.454 ms 494.378 ms 495.138 ms

1st August 2006
http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=49327&highlight=www.google.com

Old traceroute (685ms to 714ms)
traceroute to www.google.com (64.233.161.104), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 196.211.2.xxx 1.027 ms 1.386 ms 1.359 ms
2 196.211.129.13 77.177 ms 77.774 ms 77.946 ms
3 196.36.80.209 77.948 ms 77.102 ms 94.168 ms
4 196.26.96.198 97.832 ms 96.796 ms 96.839 ms
5 168.210.250.81 668.211 ms 668.534 ms 668.860 ms
6 168.210.250.80 675.902 ms 680.786 ms 683.470 ms
7 168.209.244.7 683.199 ms 687.071 ms 687.110 ms
8 core1-0-2-0.lga.net.google.com (198.32.160.130) 645.160 ms 646.799 ms 646.298 ms
9 216.239.49.34 649.061 ms 650.998 ms 648.063 ms
10 66.249.94.235 649.901 ms 652.630 ms 654.544 ms
11 72.14.238.232 636.520 ms 640.438 ms 656.726 ms
12 72.14.236.200 657.401 ms 72.14.236.202 659.457 ms 662.323 ms
13 216.239.49.214 665.387 ms 672.893 ms 216.239.48.190 704.521 ms
14 64.233.161.104 685.710 ms 714.551 ms 714.085 ms

 

[general_koffi]

I still get 600-700...

When the network is quiet, that is. Like at night or on weekends. It's often over 1000 during business hours.

I'm switching to SAIX soon.

 

[kilos]

IS Business 512 Fiber package, great package for now

traceroute 64.233.161.104
traceroute to 64.233.161.104 (64.233.161.104), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.77.246 (192.168.77.246) 0.313 ms 0.396 ms 0.405 ms
2 196.33.245.xxx (196.33.245.xxx) 2.663 ms 2.617 ms 1.773 ms
3 196.34.50.33 (196.34.50.33) 65.084 ms 69.347 ms 72.474 ms
4 196.36.80.217 (196.36.80.217) 76.133 ms 75.953 ms 75.561 ms
5 196.26.96.195 (196.26.96.195) 77.987 ms 77.218 ms 76.880 ms
6 core1b-rba-gi0-1.rtr.isnet.net (196.26.0.10) 78.732 ms 79.078 ms 78.933 ms
7 168.209.160.89 (168.209.160.89) 252.109 ms 253.394 ms 253.809 ms
8 168.209.224.65 (168.209.224.65) 257.630 ms 257.883 ms 258.562 ms
9 195.66.226.125 (195.66.226.125) 246.984 ms 248.444 ms 248.267 ms
10 66.249.95.130 (66.249.95.130) 246.458 ms 249.671 ms 249.332 ms
11 66.249.95.146 (66.249.95.146) 322.735 ms 325.198 ms 329.187 ms
12 216.239.49.34 (216.239.49.34) 325.723 ms 330.409 ms 331.551 ms
13 66.249.94.235 (66.249.94.235) 310.293 ms 313.403 ms 339.038 ms
14 72.14.238.232 (72.14.238.232) 313.993 ms 314.537 ms 317.482 ms
15 72.14.236.200 (72.14.236.200) 321.495 ms 319.736 ms 72.14.236.202 (72.14.236.202) 305.867 ms
16 216.239.48.190 (216.239.48.190) 309.890 ms 313.302 ms 319.023 ms
17 64.233.161.104 (64.233.161.104) 318.949 ms 318.084 ms 318.420 ms

Even better times of 250ms to the below IP
traceroute to www.google.com (209.85.129.99), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.77.246 (192.168.77.246) 0.407 ms 0.397 ms 0.358 ms
2 196.33.245.xxx (196.33.245.xxx) 2.677 ms 2.586 ms 2.290 ms
3 196.34.50.33 (196.34.50.33) 66.456 ms 70.911 ms 72.960 ms
4 196.36.80.217 (196.36.80.217) 76.879 ms 76.865 ms 77.355 ms
5 196.26.96.195 (196.26.96.195) 77.470 ms 78.150 ms 77.950 ms
6 core1b-rba-gi0-1.rtr.isnet.net (196.26.0.10) 79.287 ms 80.610 ms 79.958 ms
7 168.209.160.89 (168.209.160.89) 252.827 ms 253.533 ms 254.821 ms
8 168.209.224.65 (168.209.224.65) 256.205 ms 256.827 ms 258.143 ms
9 195.66.224.125 (195.66.224.125) 245.262 ms 249.217 ms 249.861 ms
10 216.239.43.91 (216.239.43.91) 254.542 ms 257.138 ms 259.985 ms
11 72.14.232.209 (72.14.232.209) 261.646 ms 265.109 ms 266.584 ms
12 72.14.238.122 (72.14.238.122) 259.941 ms 258.830 ms 259.569 ms
13 72.14.232.205 (72.14.232.205) 248.287 ms 72.14.232.207 (72.14.232.207) 249.808 ms 72.14.232.205 (72.14.232.205) 249.230 ms
14 72.14.233.206 (72.14.233.206) 256.379 ms 256.891 ms 257.577 ms
15 209.85.129.99 (209.85.129.99) 251.681 ms 252.054 ms 250.741 ms

 

[Clipse]

Have a look at saix adsl during the day the last week, over 1000ms internationally.

Really weird.

 

[Ekhaatvensters]

Wow, that IS fibre really is amazing. but my iBurst which is simlar to IS sattelite (also goes over sattelite I belive, even though they et BW from Verizon??) has also gotten better lateley.

It was never as bad as your guys IS, only ever hit 600's with a pretty *** iBUrst connection uring the daytime. Now it gets highish 400's late night, and 500's day time mostly.

 

[general_koffi]

Wow, that IS fibre really is amazing. but my iBurst which is simlar to IS sattelite (also goes over sattelite I belive, even though they et BW from Verizon??) has also gotten better lateley.

iBurst should be significantly affected by the fact that it's wireless, though.

Or maybe that only affects local...