Is Covid-19 just a hype?

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
on Gloves.

"In Germany, a mask requirement was introduced in public transport and in retail outlets. The president of the World Medical Association, Frank Montgomery, has criticized this as „wrong“ and the intended use of scarves and drapes as „ridiculous“. In fact, studies show that the use of masks in everyday life does not bring measurable benefits to healthy and asymptomatic people, which is why the Swiss infectiologist Dr. Vernazza spoke of a „media hype“. Other critics speak of a symbol of „forced, publicly visible obedience“.

The Swiss Propaganda Research is an amazing site. They blew the scam on the Syrian Chemical Weapons and mass censorship.


Here is a video being crowdfunded that aims to expose the WHO.


Those comments were made when they still believed that corona could only be transmitted by someone sneezing or coughing on you.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
How does the gloves work? You know that it doesn't come through your skin right? So touching anything with your gloved hand or normal hand would be the same, just don't touch your face.
The mask will work for you sending to them not the other way around.

I'd rather not get coronavirus on my hands, thanks.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
Again what you're saying is not logically consistent.

Its the argument of A comes before B, therefore A causes B. That is your argument. Anyone with a bit of training in analysis knows that you need to have a control for that.

Also SAs testing capacity is so low that you cannot make any conclusion from our data.


Back to your graph, basically that data shows that there are two types of peaks.

The first one happened before lockdown and the 2nd one after lockdown. Why did we have a 2nd peak of the same size after lockdown?

Break down the data to the locations, Gauteng vs Western Cape or perhaps testing centres etc etc. It will paint a different picture.
View attachment 830557

do you see the problem?

I see the problem.

To quote @Geoff.D :
1. The current testing methodologies used in most countries are NOT leading to a reliable estimate of the numbers of people infected.
2. The resultant estimates of fatality rates are just too damn high, causing unreasonable panic.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
You know you can wash them right? Just don't touch your face.
Again, why would I want to get covid on my hands and have to wash it off afterwards, when I can wear gloves and not get it on my hands in the first place? I'm also way less likely to touch my face with gloves on.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
Of course gloves and masks work. covid doesn't penetrate through plastic gloves

The virus also doesn't penetrate skin. And even if you have a cut on your hand and it gets in there you wont get COVID-19

Also, use the correct terms. There is a virus and a disease that is caused by the virus.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
Again, why would I want to get covid on my hands and have to wash it off afterwards, when I can wear gloves and not get it on my hands in the first place? I'm also way less likely to touch my face with gloves on.
You're probably one of those numbnuts that disinfects his shoes before you go into your house.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,979
on Gloves.

"In Germany, a mask requirement was introduced in public transport and in retail outlets. The president of the World Medical Association, Frank Montgomery, has criticized this as „wrong“ and the intended use of scarves and drapes as „ridiculous“. In fact, studies show that the use of masks in everyday life does not bring measurable benefits to healthy and asymptomatic people, which is why the Swiss infectiologist Dr. Vernazza spoke of a „media hype“. Other critics speak of a symbol of „forced, publicly visible obedience“.

The Swiss Propaganda Research is an amazing site. They blew the scam on the Syrian Chemical Weapons and mass censorship.


Here is a video being crowdfunded that aims to expose the WHO.

Swiss Propaganda Research, used an article from Global Research, who are a bunch of crackpots.

Some good examples of other articles posted by Global Research -

- Bosnian Genocide is a hoax
- Tianemen Square massacre was faked by the west to slander China.
- 9/11 was an inside job
- Charlie Hebdo attacks were fake
- HAARP is a legitimate weapon to control weather.
- Zionists collaborated to create the Holocaust for profit.
- Describes North Korea as a fabulous place.

So it begs the question, why does a "Propaganda Research" institute use such insane conspiracy theorists for their sources?
 

Nicodeamus

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
14,477
You're probably one of those numbnuts that disinfects his shoes before you go into your house.

Or take a bath in detol each night.


if anyone wants a basic understanding of how our immune system works and how many viruses and bacteria that you're exposed to on a daily basis.
 

Nicodeamus

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
14,477
Swiss Propaganda Research, used an article from Global Research, who are a bunch of crackpots.

Some good examples of other articles posted by Global Research -

- Bosnian Genocide is a hoax
- Tianemen Square massacre was faked by the west to slander China.
- 9/11 was an inside job
- Charlie Hebdo attacks were fake
- HAARP is a legitimate weapon to control weather.
- Zionists collaborated to create the Holocaust for profit.
- Describes North Korea as a fabulous place.

So it begs the question, why does a "Propaganda Research" institute use such insane conspiracy theorists for their sources?

I guess even conspiracy nut jobs can at times get their facts correct?

I am pretty sure that they do not list any of the above on their site.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
The 5th of April?

It plainly says that they based their analysis on the WHO report about covid in china (which was released in february) which says that the virus transmits through "contact and droplets" from coughing and sneezing.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
Swiss Propaganda Research, used an article from Global Research, who are a bunch of crackpots.
Why don't you tackle the Syrian Chemical Weapons bit as quoted in the original? Oh, right, because the mainstream media's reporting on it was indeed false. Ok.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,356
Swiss Propaganda Research, used an article from Global Research, who are a bunch of crackpots.

Some good examples of other articles posted by Global Research -

- Bosnian Genocide is a hoax


So it begs the question, why does a "Propaganda Research" institute use such insane conspiracy theorists for their sources?

The actual article I think you mean is this one: https://swprs.org/propaganda-in-the-war-on-yugoslavia/

They list all their sources and I followed several of those and there is nothing tinfoil hat-ish about any of them.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,979
Top