Is Covid-19 just a hype?

B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
Interesting set of graphs.
eb385cfc7e2616d25ce3ff59df22120e.jpg
 
Jabulani22

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
buka001 said:
You are an alien lizard with a human skin as cover to lower the average IQ of the human race.
Click to expand...
Nice attacking the man and not the subject.
1588497580488.jpg

Here have some cops out fighting the real crime , beach fun during covid , Australia this time.
I'm sure these guys were performing essential police duties .
 
Jabulani22

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
Jabulani22

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
1588501952515m.jpg
Man these Tasmanian police sure do take this seriously.
More state enforced hype pics .
 
V

Verde

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
1,592
Forum Reader said:
It's possible that there is still some disconnect between what is classified as a Covid-19 death vs a normal death. As it is, the data says that only around half of the actual Covid-19 deaths in each week have been counted as Covid-19 deaths. If all deaths for Week 17 goes up again then we will know there even more of this at play. Though there could be some lag as well in the official death data from ONS vs Covid-19 death data.

Those Covid-19 death counts should be more up to date but we also know they are under-counting by about half. So the only reliable counts right now are those officially registered deaths from all causes.
Click to expand...

Yes the official numbers under count because many deaths outside of hospital are not confirmed to be Covid-19 related for various reasons.

The ONS data is +99% accurate when they publish it, unlike the US CDC data which is only 50-70% complete when published and takes 8 weeks to be fully updated.
 
Hamish McPanji

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,084
buka001 said:
You are asking people to disprove something you made up in your head.

That is not how it works.
Click to expand...
He wants to see signs posted saying murder is bad. Otherwise they're apparently saying that camping is worse than murder. That's Jabulogic22
 
Jabulani22

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
Hamish McPanji said:
He wants to see signs posted saying murder is bad. Otherwise they're apparently saying that camping is worse than murder. That's Jabulogic22
Click to expand...
I'd settle for some few proud tweets involving any crimes besides covid camping/extremist social distancing.
 
tetrasect

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,101
Jabulani22 said:
And yet you knew it was the same numbers I previously posted ? Which were cdc numbers , trolling or just not reading ?
Anyway still no graph of how long exponential spread takes to infect 8 bn , guess that means it should take less than 5 months.
Click to expand...

Wow... comprehension is really not your strong suit.

There's 2 different things here. Nr.1 you said that the cdc revised deaths down from 60k to 37k based on the fact that the CDC data (the same data that you used previously to claim all-cause deaths were lower than they actually are) says 37k deaths, without realizing that it hasn't been updated yet (even though it says it hasn't been updated like all over the page). So it's the exact same mistake you made previously.

Then Nr. 2 you posted a random screen shot without any link or any other information saying that there are 5k probable covid deaths which have not been laboratory tested. That is the one I want a link to.

And as far as the spread rate not being exponential goes, you have no idea what you are talking about.
You could take the most infectious virus in existence and if you only let it infect one person in the time is stays contagious it would also not spread exponentially. That means fkall.

The spread rate is measured under normal conditions of no social distancing, no lockdown, no masks, no travel bans and no limits on gatherings. Under those conditions every person with coronavirus will infect on average between 2 and 3 people.
 
Jabulani22

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
tetrasect said:
Wow... comprehension is really not your strong suit.

There's 2 different things here. Nr.1 you said that the cdc revised deaths down from 60k to 37k based on the fact that the CDC data (the same data that you used previously to claim all-cause deaths were lower than they actually are) says 37k deaths, without realizing that it hasn't been updated yet (even though it says it hasn't been updated like all over the page). So it's the exact same mistake you made previously.

Then Nr. 2 you posted a random screen shot without any link or any other information saying that there are 5k probable covid deaths which have not been laboratory tested. That is the one I want a link to.

And as far as the spread rate not being exponential goes, you have no idea what you are talking about.
You could take the most infectious virus in existence and if you only let it infect one person in the time is stays contagious it would also not spread exponentially. That means fkall.

The spread rate is measured under normal conditions of no social distancing, no lockdown, no masks, no travel bans and no limits on gatherings. Under those conditions every person with coronavirus will infect on average between 2 and 3 people.
Click to expand...
nice blog post , your first two paragraphs show you are disingenuous and trying to shame me lol.
So still no graph , because if it spread exponentially we would all have it already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top