Is iMac with retina worth the extra money?

nhanekom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
122
At the moment I still do my photo editing on a 9 year old MBP, so even the bottom-of-the-range iMac today will already be a huge improvement for me, but I get what you're saying. If I'm going to spend R25k, I might as well spend the extra R10k and get something that's going to perform much better and probably last me longer.
 

PostmanPot

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
34,953
At the moment I still do my photo editing on a 9 year old MBP, so even the bottom-of-the-range iMac today will already be a huge improvement for me, but I get what you're saying. If I'm going to spend R25k, I might as well spend the extra R10k and get something that's going to perform much better and probably last me longer.

I think you might as well, that said I understand it may be 'overkill' for your needs. You'll never look back though and will ask how you put up with a 9 year old MBP for so long. :p

Unless the r5K iMac is going to have you and your family eating bread and water for months...
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,382
At the moment I still do my photo editing on a 9 year old MBP, so even the bottom-of-the-range iMac today will already be a huge improvement for me, but I get what you're saying. If I'm going to spend R25k, I might as well spend the extra R10k and get something that's going to perform much better and probably last me longer.

Until last month I was doing my editing on a series of MBPs ranging from 17" to, until recently, a 13" non-retina - the retina display on my new 15" is impressive. If I was going to switch to desktop, and I hope I never have to, then it would be the retina iMac.
 

genetic

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
37,594
iMacs are frowned upon at the office :eek:

Ours too! :D

Only the Mac Pro "dustbins" suffice... still no 5K display :(.

Stud_01.jpg
 
Top