-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
Sign up with GoogleIs it just me? or is it flying today..
- Thread starter roddyp
- Start date
guest2013-1
guest
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,800
its not just you, im on 512k and since last night my bit torrents are averaging 35-45kb/s with spikes up to 60-67kb/s... definatly my monies worth, but Im not getting excited just yet...
Hell, my gran on a scooter with a memory stick is faster than Sentech's MyWireless!
Hell, my gran on a scooter with a memory stick is faster than Sentech's MyWireless!
You shouldn't use a torrent to judge whether you're getting your money's worth, because torrents open lots of connections each going at a snail's pace. Rather do a single thread download from an intl ftp site.
Anyways, 20KB/s on a 256K is hardly what you're paying for...some where you're still loosing round about 12KB/s which is almost 2x ISDN connections!!!
--
256k ... BAH..more like 25.6k
FSCK YOU Sentech!! [
!]
Anyways, 20KB/s on a 256K is hardly what you're paying for...some where you're still loosing round about 12KB/s which is almost 2x ISDN connections!!!
--
256k ... BAH..more like 25.6k
FSCK YOU Sentech!! [
!]guest2013-1
guest
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,800
nonroker, true, but this has been the first time I've seen my old speeds (sort of) in longer than a month... used to get max 19kb/s and average round about 14...
Hell, my gran on a scooter with a memory stick is faster than Sentech's MyWireless!
Hell, my gran on a scooter with a memory stick is faster than Sentech's MyWireless!
eg.
`debian-30r0-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso' at 401069440 (69%) 1.1K/s eta:55h [Receiving data]
That on my sucktech connection.
The same site from my friend's 2MB IS leased line he get's 190KB/s
But when I open 30-40 connections to the site on my sucktech connection I get round about 16KB/s
--
256k ... BAH..more like 25.6k
FSCK YOU Sentech!! [!]
`debian-30r0-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso' at 401069440 (69%) 1.1K/s eta:55h [Receiving data]
That on my sucktech connection.
The same site from my friend's 2MB IS leased line he get's 190KB/s
But when I open 30-40 connections to the site on my sucktech connection I get round about 16KB/s
--
256k ... BAH..more like 25.6k
FSCK YOU Sentech!! [
!]It's one of Sucktech's "clever" bandwidth sharing solutions - they give you a day or two of great connectivity and then it sucks for a week. When you get the great connectivity again, you are so happy, you forget about the bad service you had for a week before that [] - they rotate thier use base in this way, so not everyone is experience good bandwidth at the same time, because they don't have enough to supply thier current tiny user base.
Slow
Slow
Slow
Ok
Fast
Slow
Slow
Slow
Slow
Ok
Ok
Fast
Slow
Slow
Slow
Ad nauseum...
That's the story of my Sucktech connection.
] - they rotate thier use base in this way, so not everyone is experience good bandwidth at the same time, because they don't have enough to supply thier current tiny user base.Slow
Slow
Slow
Ok
Fast
Slow
Slow
Slow
Slow
Ok
Ok
Fast
Slow
Slow
Slow
Ad nauseum...
That's the story of my Sucktech connection.
When all of Joburg goes on holiday in December it will be interesting to do speed tests then. []
For me, streaming audio has been consistent this past week.
_________________________________________________________________________
custenna, variable 8 - 13 signal, ber 28% - 42%.<i> "I am the only one with this problem." </i>
]For me, streaming audio has been consistent this past week.
_________________________________________________________________________
custenna, variable 8 - 13 signal, ber 28% - 42%.<i> "I am the only one with this problem." </i>
Taken from the site : http://www.the-scream.co.uk/html/resources/adsltips.html
Check it out, as it goes on to a discussion about RWIN and MTU settings.
"GETTING THE MOST FROM YOUR ADSL CONNECTIONcable
>> TS! ADSL PROVIDERS GUIDE
The first time you connect to the Internet with your all-new ADSL modem, you may find that you are not surfing or downloading at the rate that you had hoped the connection would give you. This guide will hopefully help you to optimize your broadband connection.
Maybe you are unsure as to what downloading speeds you should be getting. Well, if you have a 500Kbps connection, you should be getting close to 60K/s when downloading. This does depend greatly on the site you are downloading from, but I have generally managed to obtain decent download speeds of 57-60K/s.
If you work it out: 500000 / 8 = 62500 (62.5K)
So 60K/s is pretty good really. In fact, the actual reason that you could never obtain a true 62.5K/s download is because of transfer loss. This can be as much as 13%. TCP/IP loss can be up to 3% and the rest is ATM loss, which can be up to 10% (ATM = a protocol for transferring data between two points).
If you're not getting this sort of speed then it is probably because your RWIN and MTU settings are incorrectly set for broadband optimization. There are other reasons of course, such as contention, but incorrect optimization is the most probable."
So with a 128 you should be getting 13.9KB, 256 = 27.8KB and so on.
I agree tho, you shouldn't be using bit-torrent downloads as a guide, it should be off a dedicated site
Check it out, as it goes on to a discussion about RWIN and MTU settings.
"GETTING THE MOST FROM YOUR ADSL CONNECTIONcable
>> TS! ADSL PROVIDERS GUIDE
The first time you connect to the Internet with your all-new ADSL modem, you may find that you are not surfing or downloading at the rate that you had hoped the connection would give you. This guide will hopefully help you to optimize your broadband connection.
Maybe you are unsure as to what downloading speeds you should be getting. Well, if you have a 500Kbps connection, you should be getting close to 60K/s when downloading. This does depend greatly on the site you are downloading from, but I have generally managed to obtain decent download speeds of 57-60K/s.
If you work it out: 500000 / 8 = 62500 (62.5K)
So 60K/s is pretty good really. In fact, the actual reason that you could never obtain a true 62.5K/s download is because of transfer loss. This can be as much as 13%. TCP/IP loss can be up to 3% and the rest is ATM loss, which can be up to 10% (ATM = a protocol for transferring data between two points).
If you're not getting this sort of speed then it is probably because your RWIN and MTU settings are incorrectly set for broadband optimization. There are other reasons of course, such as contention, but incorrect optimization is the most probable."
So with a 128 you should be getting 13.9KB, 256 = 27.8KB and so on.
I agree tho, you shouldn't be using bit-torrent downloads as a guide, it should be off a dedicated site
On Friday I fired up 3 torrents, shareaza and dc++. Everything seemed to be connecting ok, so I packed up and went to Woodstock. When I got back home, 48 hours later, I eagerly checked my bandwidth monitor stats. I was still connected, no disconnects. But it turned out I downloaded 200MB in that period. Which works out to about 4 MB an hour.
Someone phoning me and reading out 1's and 0's would probably transfer faster than this crap.
Cowtenna | 12% Signal | Tower 82 ( Mintek ) | 256K
Someone phoning me and reading out 1's and 0's would probably transfer faster than this crap.
Cowtenna | 12% Signal | Tower 82 ( Mintek ) | 256K
clivedoubell
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2004
- Messages
- 71
Well today is Tuesday, so it should be a 128 day. I'm downloading a 1.4G file intl with Getright. I've been watching it for more than an hour now and the average is about 3.5 KB/s. Every now and then it peaks at 8 & 10 KB/s but only for a very short while. And then it goes down to 2 and even 1 KB/s. At this rate it will take me more than 100 hours to download this file. So much for Broadband. Broadband se gat.
128 on tower 66 4ways
128 on tower 66 4ways
clivedoubell
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2004
- Messages
- 71
Is anybody else getting these fantastic speeds for 128, or am I the only one that has this problem? It's very cool that some people get decent speeds, but that doesn't help me one iota. I get crap speeds. I have been monitoring this download for more than 4 hours, and the average speed is below 4KB/S. This is worse than dialup, and dialup is not broadband and it will never be.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by clivedoubell</i>
<br />Is anybody else getting these fantastic speeds for 128, or am I the only one that has this problem?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
No you're not the only one, my international seems to average about 4 KB/s or so, and varies from about 8KB/s when at its best, down to about +/- 2.5KB/s sometimes. This makes some tasks very time-consuming e.g. to 'Windows Update' a machine for a client, and time=money. (And you can't use multi-thread d/ling for WU, nor does squid help because MS's f* WU client always does 'refresh' GETs. I anyway refuse to use multi-thread downloaders because the connection is <i>supposed</i> to work properly 'as is' with normal single-threaded downloads).
<br />Is anybody else getting these fantastic speeds for 128, or am I the only one that has this problem?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
No you're not the only one, my international seems to average about 4 KB/s or so, and varies from about 8KB/s when at its best, down to about +/- 2.5KB/s sometimes. This makes some tasks very time-consuming e.g. to 'Windows Update' a machine for a client, and time=money. (And you can't use multi-thread d/ling for WU, nor does squid help because MS's f* WU client always does 'refresh' GETs. I anyway refuse to use multi-thread downloaders because the connection is <i>supposed</i> to work properly 'as is' with normal single-threaded downloads).