Oh no, you're not going to get hung up on the translation of "mozlem",........ that's in this thread:So you start losing the argument and resort to using derogatory spelling of the word Muslim.
Really, you don't see the connection?from flying horses to charlie hebdo
And it's not for the lack of trying on the part of mozlems.but Rushdie is not dead right?
Every time news breaks of another islamic terrorist attack on innocent civilians, the jihadis start with the deflection and absurd conspiracy theories.bomb a petrol garage in Saudi Arabia with pin point accuracy by passing american tecnology defense systems... easy
kill a guy that writes books... difficult
I already told you what i think of wood and his theories, you haven't admitted that everything he says is biased, so you either with him as a Christian (or wannabe) or not. All in or all out you can't pick or choose as i mentioned his goal is to prove Christianity is correct, you can't pick and choose what he says is correct or not since his intending is clear. So 1 sentence or if his mouth is 1/4 true its based on his ulterior motive to convert , so cannot be trusted.If only the supporters who liked your post (!?!) can come on here and provide answers to issues you are so clearly trying to avoid. That would be productive.
Let me go on record and say the whole miracles, trinity, resurrection, jesus dying for sins etc is all religious clap trap. Your turn - dismiss what Wood says as fabrications and lies, designed to promote christianity.
I'm supposed to know who this guy is?
Like i said, nothing more than herdsmen and sheep on display here. So please, fact check your scholars especially when they talk about Mo.
And you could say the same about every follower of muhammad in this day and age.
I'm not the one who has no problem with religious indoctrination of children, and follower of muhammad ....... cough, cough.You the one who wants to raise his kid based on the advise of Richard Dawkins and one of his advices is to allow Minor Pedofilia Hence you accept it.
I ment look like me as in because the are or claim to be muslim, why again you guys seem to think we must follow whoever says they are a scholar or religious leader.Do you also use henna in your hair and beard?
so why post a video , its what dawkins thinks, so do you support what he says or not?I'm not the one who has no problem with religious indoctrination of children, and follower of muhammad ....... cough, cough.
The jihadis here sure tie themselves in knots.In the same vain since Dawkins condones pedopilia must we asume that all atheists condoneit.
of course not not all do, you do of course because you pushing people to follow him so you must agree with everything he says and does.
Did i post telling you to follow Khomeini rulings or advise? No.The jihadis here sure tie themselves in knots.
If we were to use your logic, it could be said that all mozlems condone the death fatwa on Salman Rushdie issued by Ayatollah Khomeini, then Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Both David and Frank are adults, but surecall me Vulgar.You're the one that responded to Frank with a vulgar sexual suggestion about Wood?
Such moral upstanding religious people.
Are you trying to say that there aren't any mozlem pedophiles?At least I'm not promoting a supporter of Pedofilia' like you have numerous times.