Competition DOESN'T bring down prices, it only increases them. Well, in South Africa at least.
You are wrong.
In sectors in SA where there is lots of competition, and consumers are still paying high prices, it is bcos consumers are sheepish and not asserting their right to shop around for better prices. IMO SA consumers seem to be impulse buyers that do not do much or any research before buying something, and when they discover they have made a mistake by supporting a retailer with higher pricing, they ***** & moan that it is someone else's mistake that they supported the retailer with higher pricing.
Telkodemonopolies is still the de facto wired fixed line monopoly in SA, that means that Telkodemonopolies has no effective competition, and Telkodemonopolies can charge whatever it likes for what is an essential service that South African citizens cannot live without, also the quality of Telkodemonopolies' service is far below the exorbitant pricing that consumers are forced to pay - those few that can afford it that it.
Telkodemonopolies is a parastatal, ~38% guavamentally owned, and Poison Ivy's idea of effective competition, is to introduce only one competitor into the market, this is not effective competition - numerous competitors are needed to make a market competitive, and more importantly there should not be any guavamental interference - especially not of the communistic ilk that Poison Ivy loves so much whilst lining her pockets with the contents of our wallets.