Adblock unfriendly.Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, quoting Eichmann first mentioned the 6 million figure...
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/holo.../6-million-where-is-the-figure-from-1.5319546
Adblock unfriendly.Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, quoting Eichmann first mentioned the 6 million figure...
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/holo.../6-million-where-is-the-figure-from-1.5319546
It directly affects the weighting of their crimes. Only 5 million dead jews would make their Nazi salute not so bad.Are the number of dead jews murdered in WW2 relevant to the kids with the Third Reich salute and the current conversation?
No difference. Nazi salute was based on Roman saluteRoman salute, Nazi salute, what's the difference?
It directly affects the weighting of there crimes. Only 5 million dead jews would make their Nazi salute not so bad.
Exactly.yeah - that makes sense on absolutely no level.
I'm so confused, do so many people just skim read the headline?
Italian fascists started using the Roman salute in the 1920s. It was adopted by the Nazi party led by Adolf Hitler and became compulsory for all German public employees in July 1933.
It is a criminal offence to use the Roman salute in Germany, the Czech Republic and Austria. Section 86a of the German Penal Code provides for punishment of up to three years in prison for anyone using the salute.
Okay. Now if you've read any other history ever. You would know the number are always estimates and in dispute.
Someone saying well maybe it wasn't 6 million but anywhere from between 3 million up to 6 million isn't a holocaust denier and doesn't decrease the level of horror. The horror stays the same.
Who the hell said that? Where?There is a difference between saying it may not have been 6 million due to stats and saying it may not be 6 million because they had a daycare, orchestra, swimming pool, etc.
The idea is to present Nazis as these loving monsters that not only DIDN'T exterminate them, they also took care of them. How DARE the jews be so ungrateful and conniving towards the furher![]()
Who the hell said that? Where?
Okay you go ahead and pander to the crazies. Be careful not to give them a food in the door.Holocaust denialism, some people start outright, others slowly work their way towards it
HD is a kneejerk nonsense term, attacking just this strawman you are propping up. No one other than actual nazi's actually claims such obvious rubbish.Holocaust denialism, some people start outright, others slowly work their way towards it
Holocaust denialism as it's accepted today is not outright denial of the holocaust occuring, it includes a range of typical statements about the holocaust and it's not only Nazi's who make them.HD is a kneejerk nonsense term, attacking just this strawman you are propping up. No one other than actual nazi's actually claims such obvious rubbish.
1) Nazi Germany's Final Solution was aimed only at deporting Jews from the Reich and did not include their extermination;
2) Nazi authorities did not use extermination camps and gas chambers for the genocidal mass murder of Jews;
3) or the actual number of Jews murdered is significantly lower than the accepted figure of 5 to 6 million, typically around a tenth of that figure.
Holocaust denialism as it's accepted today is not outright denial of the holocaust occuring