Ivermectin: balance of evidence shows no benefit against Covid-19

JangoFett

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
846
Link broken ---- can you help find the new link?

Add an 'n' to the end. ;)
 

Howdy

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
4,830
You've been posting troll like remarks repeatedly. How does "Troll" advance the conversation?
How does deliberate attempts at winning an argument, even if it's by being dishonest and petty, help? People that know better, yet stoop to those levels are doing it.

sheep dip
 

Howdy

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
4,830
Link broken ---- can you help find the new link?
My bad, copy/paste error, sorry.

 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878

Add an 'n' to the end. ;)
Eish. I just clicked on it. --- hate these damn tablet devices! Off to my laptop rather.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
Sorry, meant Radium.

It was used as a valid treatment for everything. Until too many people died from it.
So what about Radon? Not also used by the medical profession?

In a radon treatment, radioactive radon is applied to people for medicinal purposes. Patients are exposed to a high concentration of radon for a short period to alleviate pain for several months and so to reduce their use of painkillers for a certain period.

So was mercury!
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
My bad, copy/paste error, sorry.

Fascinating read! Need to spend some more time on it, but this sentence sticks out.

A critical policy related implication is that online recommender systems can bias search results and thus the visibility of specific scientific findings. This is relevant to the next generation of scientists using these search environments and those who evaluate scientists and their work.
And the comments of many other people as well.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,215

A good article. Merck only makes 5% of the world's supply. They gifted the IVM patent when they could not make any money from it. For comparison Merck at the time could only make a few cents from each IVM dose. It was a completely unprofitable drug for them. The Covid drugs however go for thousands of Dollars per treatment. IVM is the perfect drug you would want to patent for the pandemic.

To summarise, if IVM was officially endorsed for treating Covid all the emergency use authorisation for vaccines and other drugs will fall away as no unapproved drug can be used on emergency or compassionate grounds outside of limited trials while an adequate approved treatment exists. There's a lot of self interest here. It could take years for any drug or vaccine to be approved.

MSM, Facebook, Twitter, Google, governments and big pharma have a LOT to answer to and it's up to us as the public to demand answers. There are at least 3 million deaths that could have been prevented and deserve recognition and people could have lived normal lives.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
To summarise, if IVM was officially endorsed for treating Covid all the emergency use authorisation for vaccines and other drugs will fall away as no unapproved drug can be used on emergency or compassionate grounds outside of limited trials while an adequate approved treatment exists.
And that is the crux of all of this! The Covid pandemic is seen as a >$ 500 billion windfall for big pharma, which they will protect with every dirty trick they can scratch out. It is why many times in the past, (actually every time there is a major worldwide health crisis involving the developed world, developing world health crises never count) the same conclusions are reached. And that is that private medical enterprises will NEVER be trustworthy in situations like this and that ALL medical developments must be taken out of any operation with a profit motive.
 
Last edited:
Top