Ivermectin: balance of evidence shows no benefit against Covid-19

PsyWulf

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
16,576
It's more like @Geoff.D trying his darndest to improve his postcount by posting the most ridiculous babble in existence. I'd go as far as saying he's thicker than a tree stump but I feel i'd be insulting trees
I think imbeciles and rocks are higher up the pyramid than him
 

Brian_G

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
12,229
You're right. You invited me, so I'll just leave this here about people getting "badly sick" as you said from the vaccine:

You've forgotten that was shown to be rather inaccurate, so fiddled with,... convenient, ne?

You think mentioning your name is an invitation?

You've lost it mate...
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,118
Lithium's another good example

Regarding poisons used as medicine causing greater alleviation of the effects of a disease than symptoms of the poisoning, chemotherapy is a case in point. Many patients remark that the cure seems worse than the disease.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,118
It's more like @Geoff.D trying his darndest to improve his postcount by posting the most ridiculous babble in existence. I'd go as far as saying he's thicker than a tree stump but I feel i'd be insulting trees
I think imbeciles and rocks are higher up the pyramid than him

Whoops. That might get you blocked too. The reason I never block anyone is because then the responses become an echo chamber of what you want to hear. Same as the Yootchoob and Google algorithms.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,118
You've forgotten that was shown to be rather inaccurate, so fiddled with,... convenient, ne?

You think mentioning your name is an invitation?

You've lost it mate...

Nope. Confirmed by the Medical Faculty at UCT. Many tried to prove it inaccurate or a fake. It was verified.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,118
Told to him by someone too unqualified themselves... unbelievable. Nobody is fooled by you.

/done

I am unqualified and incapable of reading medical research. The difference is I know it and realise my limitations. He refuses to recognise his limitations.
 

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
31,550
4385d86ba75ab7b54b0aa1c135f79532.jpg
 

PsyWulf

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
16,576
Whoops. That might get you blocked too. The reason I never block anyone is because then the responses become an echo chamber of what you want to hear. Same as the Yootchoob and Google algorithms.
Rather an intelligent echo chamber,I feel my braincells melt every time his name pops up

It's like a Soap opera
You can skip watching 2 years
Accidentally catch one episode and you already guessed 90% of what happened
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,524
Just so we don’t have to rehash the same arguments, this is the post where it was first discussed

@Cosmik Debris

I have just read an article on the India Bar association which is now taking the WHO to court.

The IBA’s 51-page notice, sent on 25 May, calls Swaminathan’s statements “highly unconscionable, misleading and issued with ulterior purposes and deliberate intention to underplay the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating the Covid-19 patients as well as its use as a prophylaxis and to dissuade people from using this drug by creating doubts in the minds of people around safety of Ivermectin”.


Sounds much like #Afriforum which took SAHPRA to court to allow doctors to prescribe Ivermectin off label from compounding pharmacies and won the case and Sahpra had to pay the 1.8M court costs. Why would Afriforum want to take Sahpra to court in the first place?


It's not my duty to convince anyone about the benefits of Ivermectin. Each person has the right to their own option as it is their own life.

In my option, big pharma such as Merck and all the others are playing a dirty game to discredit Ivermectin as their is no profit to be made off an off-patent drug, but at the cost of human lives.
Over 4,Million people worldwide have died from covid. Dr Andrew Hill, advisor to WHO even in his last dismal paper that was done had shown a low 56% decrease in mortality. That is still over 2 Million people who's life would most likely have been spared if they did get the proper antiviral treatment. Other randomized trials show up to 80% efficacy when used as prophylaxis. But that you would have read if you bothered to lookup the layman's summary of the trials on https://ivmmeta.com

IVM safety record shows 20 deaths since 1992 after more than 3 Billion doses had been destributed. Merck distributed 55Mil doses themselves to successfully treat and irradiate RiverBlindness. I have a 1hr video interview with Roy Vagelos who was the CEO and founder or Merck who talks about their trials with Metctizan (Ivermectin) and how safe the drug is. FDA has reported that already 5208 deaths have occurred due to taking the vaccine and that is just in 1 year. IVM is even safer than panado at avg 458 deaths per year in the US alone and more than 100,000 hospitalizations. (Wiki paracetamol poisoning)

Funny how Merck the original manufacturer has now made the turnaround to say that they cannot recommend ivermectin as the safety has not been proven with Covid. Probably because they have been to busy with their new patented drug molnupiravir which the US goverment has PREpaid 1.2B$ US for 1.7 million courses of this antiviral drug which is only now starting trials.


Merck was coincidently also one of major sponsers for the last trial in which there was no apparent benefit seen and noted that there was increase ventilator use when using ivermectin. Wonder why this was not noted in any of the other 61 trials.

You know the saying Money or your Life. This should now be rewritten as "Money for your Life" thanks to big pharma.

So what antiviral medicines do our current state hospitals provide for outpatient to treat mild Covid Virus? Any? Sounds like big pharma pays your salary.
 
Top