King of de Jungle
- Mar 17, 2005
People are still wasting time on this?
See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
It's a blog post buddy.Another qualified expert tearing apart dodgy IVM data. The quacks on this forum will try to discredit him as well, but notice how they'll never actually argue against his points or refute his opinions with proper scientific methodology etc - because none of them actually have any qualifications or experience in analyzing medical evidence.
Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine, take 7: Are there positive studies that aren't fraudulent?Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine, a drug that almost certainly doesn’t work but is still being touted as a “miracle cure” by quacks.respectfulinsolence.com
It's a blog post buddy.
Come back when you have a peer reviewed study. This is not empirical evidence. It is just an opinion piece
All the studies say it works.Don't come at me with your nonsense, "buddy". We both know you couldn't care less about the importance of peer reviews and good evidence, otherwise you wouldn't believe in IVM working etc etc
Dude. Some Twitter post and an opinion piece on a blog is not evidence. You have no evidence.No, they really don't. That's why the Cochrane's conclusion of the current state of evidence is that there is no good evidence to support its use currently. But you couldn't care two cents about what the expert peer review consensus currently is.
No, select studies say it works. The rest say little to no effect. Is your selective comprehension that bad?
Or are you part of the Cult of IVM Pros here on the forums?
Dude. Some Twitter post and an opinion piece on a blog is not evidence. You have no evidence.
What do you call posting some random opinion piece as supposed evidence?He's a known troll. Source: read his comments to me yesterday where he seemed to think I have a problem with pharma companies making money and called me a communist, despite no where in any of my posts did I even remotely bring up such a topic.
It basically says inconclusive.