Jacob Zuma openly defies Zondo commission, says he is ready to be jailed

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,064

The three-month extension of the State Capture Inquiry means that there is still an opportunity for former President Jacob Zuma to testify – but will the Constitutional Court give him the chance to avoid jail by doing so?

Yes, naturally it could end up the very same as prescribing in dealing with Zuma through the Zondo report. In the case this is the route the ConCourt has taken, then it is up to the conditions set by them.

Either Zuma attend the inquiry to give his testimony, conditionally, or it will simply be back to Stalingrad tactics. Imagine the ConCourt rules that Zuma should give testimony in Zondo's absence... but the best route would be to stipulate in an order to attend the summons as recalled by the Zondo Commission.

I don't know... say the system is helping him to avoid sentencing, then I assume the tactic is to deal with him through the report which will make it an ANC matter which will be a Constitutional blow and the public shouldn't accept it. The public interest and Constitution rests with the courts.

The best chance to see Zuma sentenced is still through the arms deal case, but to see the ConCourt act and rule Zuma to be in contempt with a recommended, by the commission, sentence then it will bankrupt Zuma's Stalingrad means. No more mucking around.

Anyway, my views, waiting on tomorrow.
 

Johnatan56

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
30,957
I want see if they will send him to prison and also make him pay costs.
Even if convicted and payments, he will never see a jail cell. They'll argue medical issues, or maybe a dignity of president type thing, whatever, but will be something. Too many corrupt people.
 

friedpiggy

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
1,663
Sheeesh, is this kark still going on? I am in my mid 40's and I am fairly sure I will hit my 80's before he "gets his day in court" that he is so"urgently" seeking.
 

Acid0

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
5,262
Well today is one of those defining days in our courts.
"IF" nobody is above the law then he needs to be treated as a normal citizen else we know the truth.

I am glad I am not that panel of judges today, either way they will be painted as either corrupt and state captured or anti revolutionary
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
I'm going for sentence but suspended on condition he goes and testifies.

I think that is the best possible outcome from the ConCourt but I doubt they will actually go that far...

I suspect it will be a case of "Go back to the commission"... which of course he will ignore, and rinse and repeat.
 

air

Expert Member
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
3,187
Can he appeal a ConCourt judgement? If not, quite sure there will be an incoming 'sick note'.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Sounds like prison...

6.jpg
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
Yussie... get to the point now...

You've found him guilty of contempt of court which is an awesome first step...

A bit of prison time would be the cherry on the cake.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,549
COMMENT: If anything, this strongly-worded judgment goes to show that slogans, letters, Twitter tirades and night-vigils organised by Carl Niehaus ain't the real world. South Africa was established as a constitutional democracy and that is what we strive for. We are a country of statutes, and even Zuma and his acolytes will have to comply. Or be forced to comply.

- Pieter du Toit
 
Top