Jeffrey Epstein: US financier 'charged with sex trafficking'

This Mike Cernovich?

c45a4d268295728c9aad86953ab6a5c5.jpg


The same Mike Cernovich who was, in no way at all behind any of this, but rather sued to unseal a court record that was there to protect one of Epstein's victims... So he could malign the victim... who’d also accused his pal Dersh.

That Mike Cernovich?

https://s9503.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Epstein-case-unseal-cernovich.pdf#page=8

Over the course of the litigation before Judge Sweet, three outside parties attempted to unseal some or all of the sealed material. On August 11, 2016, Dershowitz moved to intervene, seeking to unseal three documents that, he argues, demonstrate that Giuffre invented the accusations against him. On January 19, 2017, Cernovich, an independent blogger and self‐described “popular political journalist,” moved to intervene, seeking to unseal the summary judgment record, and Dershowitz joined his motion. On April 6, 2018, after the case had settled, the Herald moved to intervene and unseal the entire docket. The District Court granted each of these motions to intervene, but denied the related requests to unseal in orders entered November 2, 2016, May 3, 2017, and August 27, 2018, respectively.

Any sources to those allegations? That's pure conjecture. Does not change the fact that he was part of the legal process.
 
Remanded for three days. Bail hearing continues Thursday.

Defense wants to present a bail package.
 
ah ok, had to go read why it was called "pizza". odd.

I like the part where a gunman arrived at Comet Pizza to self-investigate the basement... and there never was a basement in the first place.
 
1562609764781.png

That is Ghislaine Maxwell (Epstein's pimp) in attendance of Chelsea Clinton's wedding.
 
You’re not even trying with that centrist thing anymore.

It’s adorable.

Questioning the Clintons, or not bringing up Bill Clinton's involvement is not a Centrist thing to do? Or not questioning why Epstein paid USD3,5 million into the Clinton Foundation while he was being investigated by the FBI. Ok then. Makes complete sense.

And here you told me it's about big money. Almost fooled me.
 
It’s adorable.

Adorable, no.

There is a whole dictionary of words with appropriately negative connotations for those who seek political "points scoring" while exploiting the abuse - even if only alleged - of women, or indeed, anyone, man, woman or child.

Abuse of anyone, should be roundly abhorred.

Exploitation of such for petty personal/political reasons is worse.

I'm sure Techne stands with me on this, at least.

I'd imagine anyone with any sense would do so, especially if they had had the experience of knowing someone who was sexually abused. Right, EmJay?
 
Last edited:
Adorable, no.

There is a whole dictionary of words with appropriately negative connotations for those who seek political "points scoring" while exploiting the abuse - even if only alleged - of women. Abuse of anyone, should be roundly abhorred.

I'm sure Techne stands with me on this, at least.

Odd that you talk about political points scoring when greggypants here is the one that made it a partisan issue with all the pics of Trump. And you zero in on me, and only me. Well done for being objective. Just like how objective you were when you chose to ignore a court opinion verifying the undercover footage of Planned Parenthood. :ROFL:
 
And you zero in on me, and only me.
I am sure Techne would like to differ with that statement in this thread. And elsewhere, Xarog, Rietrot, NBFTL et al. although I similarly have no specific fascination with any of them, either
Well done for being objective.
Well done to you, too. We could both be in the objectiveness olymbics, I suppose. I do have a sense of who would win... objectively, of course.

chose to ignore a court opinion verifying the undercover footage of Planned Parenthood. :ROFL:
This is your favourite tactic. Alleging that someone is ignoring your earth shattering "proof". Or your wager. Or your "solid proof". No one plays that game with you so I'm not sure how you think it will help your cause.

I am sorry, EmJay. MyBB is at best light entertainment for me while I wait for interminable Jenkins deploy scripts to complete. I am not choosing to ignore you, I am simply ignoring you because you are irrelevant outside the few threads in which we encounter each other.

Sorry. I dont feel that way about you.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry, EmJay. MyBB is at best light entertainment for me while I wait for interminable Jenkins deploy scripts to complete. I am not choosing to ignore you, I am simply ignoring you because you are irrelevant outside the few threads in which we encounter each other.

Guess my abortion stances trigger you so much that you feel the need to comment on all my posts? Sorry that you have to work late into the evenings. It really does suck. I am at the stage in my life where I don't need to. It makes sense why you are so uptight.
 
Questioning the Clintons, or not bringing up Bill Clinton's involvement is not a Centrist thing to do? Or not questioning why Epstein paid USD3,5 million into the Clinton Foundation while he was being investigated by the FBI. Ok then. Makes complete sense.

And here you told me it's about big money. Almost fooled me.

Here she is with a Sarah Ferguson

dd4e2469762e00879d9926b20f570e6f.jpg


And Naomi Campbell

c84deeed05dfbb447d56e15debb0a677.jpg


And Elon Musk

69f16e6a2ba2e9bcd198d821c2a42bc1.jpg


See. Centrist.

Now you try.
 
Odd that you talk about political points scoring when greggypants here is the one that made it a partisan issue with all the pics of Trump. And you zero in on me, and only me. Well done for being objective. Just like how objective you were when you chose to ignore a court opinion verifying the undercover footage of Planned Parenthood. :ROFL:

Y’all didn’t even read the second post in this thread I was referring to with those pics. Did ya?

Do better Em.

EDIT: Even jack_spratt opened the google machine in response to those pics. He might have learned something today don’t cha think.
 
Last edited:
Y’all didn’t even read the second post in this thread I was referring to with those pics. Did ya?

Do better Em.

So why did you only include any sort of evidence pointing to Trump?
 
So why did you only include any sort of evidence pointing to Trump?

“But MSM say he is connected to Trump. LOL” - jack_spratt. Second post in this thread.

Also, see my post-post edit of the post you’re replying to.
 
Sorry that you have to work late into the evenings. It really does suck. I am at the stage in my life where I don't need to. It makes sense why you are so uptight.
I could have used a metaphor such as, "do a poo" instead - which is roughly as accurate - but you are welcome to place your fake sympathy wherever you wish to misplace it.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter