Jesus Christ proof: Richard Dawkins in shock ‘archaeological evidence’ claim over Messiah

[rambo919]

It rained for 40 days and 40 nights then stopped.

So nothing would have exposed the peaks and then covered them up again.

Scripture says the water covered the mountain peaks - so there were mountains ....

Only after a year on the ark did the dove come back with proof that life had returned to the earth.

( don't ask how an olive tree was able to grow and get new leaves after being underwater for 12 months... )

Can a dove or crow fly around the earth covering the entire area in a week or just the area around the moving (important part) ark?

Mountains could have changed size because of plate inertia..... and it does not say the peaks were permanently covered it just states covered which means it could have been temporary..... also Noah's point of view was the ark he could not see everywhere especially halfway around the earth nevermind the other side.

Not all places would receive the same flooding as the water calmed down and started receding, the tree could easily grow on a mountainside. It does not say how large the tree was only that it was large enough to grow a minimum of one leaf.

 

[EADC]

I really think if you want to discuss the flood that you read the account first.

The flood was not 40 days and 40 nights - it rained for 40 days and forty nights.

Noah etc were aboard the ark for around a year.

And there were not a pair of every animal on board.

This is fairly obvious considering we do not have unicorns anymore

 

[EADC]

Correct.

I don't think you get what he is saying

 

[rambo919]

Umm again just nope... Science (and the evidence of plate tectonics etc) totally disagrees with your opinion on this.

Which shows your assumptions that: current plate tectonics theory is complete, seperated plates have always existed, a large impact would not alter their movement drastically even if they did exist beforehand.

 

[rambo919]

I don't think you get what he is saying

You know the funny thing about that....... for any of the tallest mountains to have been sea-bed..... they had to have been flooded......

 

[EADC]

You know the funny thing about that....... for any of the tallest mountains to have been sea-bed..... they had to have been flooded......

Just no.

 

[Ponderer]

Could have just stopped at clueless

The circle that is busy jerking each other off here is comprised of Atheists.
Most (but not all) Atheists think they are so clever, but they unable to even distinguish between fake/bogus science (aka as scientism) and actual/true/real science.

 

[daveza]

WHALE FOSSILS HIGH IN ANDES SHOW HOW MOUNTAINS ROSE FROM SEA (Published 1987)

www.nytimes.com

Among the fossils the scientists reported bringing back were the bones of whales and other marine animals found at altitudes of more than 5,000 feet. When these animals died from 15 million to 20 million years ago, their carcasses settled to the ocean floor and were embedded in submarine sediments. But since then, the violent upthrusting of the Andean chain has carried the sediments to the tops of mountains. In geological terms, the time the fossils took to rise from ocean floor to mountain top was relatively brief.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Which shows your assumptions that: current plate tectonics theory is complete, seperated plates have always existed, a large impact would not alter their movement drastically even if they did exist beforehand.

I don't think there are enough facepalms in the world for this post.

 

[daveza]

The circle that is busy jerking each other off here is comprised of Atheists.
Most (but not all) Atheists think they are so clever, but they unable to even distinguish between fake/bogus science (aka as scientism) and actual/true/real science.

Once again don't presume that anyone who questions 'the flood' is an atheist.

 

[EADC]

The circle that is busy jerking each other off here is comprised of Atheists.
Most (but not all) Atheists think they are so clever, but they unable to even distinguish between fake/bogus science (aka as scientism) and actual/true/real science.

I'm just here to find out why Noah left the unicorns behind, it is a travesty and I want answers.

 

[Lupus]

I'm just here to find out why Noah left the unicorns behind, it is a travesty and I want answers.

They still exist they just a lot chubbier than portrayed.

 

[ToxicBunny]

They still exist they just a lot chubbier than portrayed.

They also have underwater versions...

 

[EADC]

They still exist they just a lot chubbier than portrayed.

atleast we know giraffes don't exist because how would they fit

 

[rambo919]

I don't think there are enough facepalms in the world for this post.

It's not my fault you are incapable of critical thinking.

 

[daveza]

Genesis 7:2-3

2 Take with you seven each of every clean animal, the male and its female, and two each of every unclean animal, the male and its female, 3 and seven each of birds of the air, the male and female, to keep offspring alive on the face of all the earth.

 

[rambo919]

Just no.

OK so explain to me.... unless a mountain peak is either completely flooded or surrounded by water.... how does it become seabed?

And don't give me billions of years because no remains would stay put that long

 

[EADC]

OK so explain to me.... unless a mountain peak is either completely flooded or surrounded by water.... how does it become seabed?

And don't give me billions of years because no remains would stay put that long

Post #228

 

[rambo919]

Post #228

SO whales existed billions of years ago and never evolved?

 

[daveza]

The whiptail lizard.



They are only available in female - no males.

So how did they get a pair on the ark ....