Jesus Christ proof: Richard Dawkins in shock ‘archaeological evidence’ claim over Messiah

[saor]

No there isn't....
And even if there was... That sort of impact would have left an incredible mark on the planet..

Random link:

That means that there had to be 813,875,076 miles³ of rain for the biblical flood. To put that in perspective, the oceans have about 321,000,000 miles³ of water. All the water on earth only adds up to about 332,500,000 miles³.

source

 

[ToxicBunny]

On one hand it could currently be under the deep oceans..... a good place for a dent no?

It would have broken up upon entry or could have been a group to begin with, the earth is full of crater lakes.... why could almost all of them not have been formed at the same time.

Just no. Basic science and facts prove you wrong.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Random link:
source

Ta...but this will just get glossed over anyway

 

[rambo919]

Just no. Basic science and facts prove you wrong.

A very weak defense.....

 

[ToxicBunny]

A very weak defense.....

OK....

 

[rambo919]

Random link:
source

Funny thing..... the underground reservoirs are not accounted for there..... why would all the water have stayed on the crust? Can we even measure all the underground reservoirs?

 

[MEIOT]

If He was not who He claimed He was then yes it's illogical to believe that.... if He however was who He claimed to be it would be illogical to not believe it.

You seem to be under the wrong impression that one pair of each species was taken aboard, the text says each kind. Each kind could easily have brought fourth the many current species.... in fact under insects it still happens all the time, you could even argue that each breed of dog is a new sub-species were it not for the fact that most breeds are synthetic. Also who says the animals were all mature?

Every "illogical" part of the bible has logical explanations. If was actually probably not a whale but a large fish, there are many types of fish in the deepest oceans we will never see because our engines scare them away. Chemical expulsions could easily literally turn someone into salt if shock freezes them in place for long enough.

You are either ignorant of under indoctrination yourself, it's rather obvious. Or ur trolling which also explains these soft balls.

You taking the piss right?
A large fish vs a whale? Really? Does it matter? Chemical expulsions turning someone in to salt? Not taking one of each sex of animal on the ark?
I'm speechless.
Clearly you are under the misguided impression that the words coming out your ass makes sense to you and so it must make sense to everyone else. That's not the case my friend.

Every illogical part of your bible has a logical explanation? Really? Go on. Apart from a large fish as opposed to a whale that swallowed that dude and chemical expulsions (whatever the fark that is) and animals species suddenly having offspring with no mate..and Noah fitting one 'kind' of each animal species at the time on a dinky(in retrospect and context) boat....go on...explain the rest of the logic in the rest of the shite.


Read back the garbage you posted and then have a good laugh at your stupidity. Critical thinking separates dumbasses like you from the rest thank fark.

Try it. Logical and critical thinking helps buddy.

Did anybody else read the garbage this guy posted and went...What in the actual fark!!??

 

[rambo919]

snip

There there friend, come back when you are sober mkay?

 

[buka001]

Major cosmic impact 12,800 years ago: Geologic and paleontological evidence unearthed in southern Chile supports the theory that a major cosmic impact event occurred approximately 12,800 years ago

When geologists set out years ago to examine signs of a major cosmic impact that occurred toward the end of the Pleistocene epoch, little did they know just how far-reaching the projected climatic effect would be.

www.sciencedaily.com

Flood myth - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Start with those two links. There's lots more evidence where that came from, including the fact that there are structures to be found underneath the sea which shows that some of the previous flooding actually never went away and thus a permanently reshaped coastline was the outcome.


Not everything is meant to be taken literally. It's kind of hard to say "A comet which impacted halway around the earth resulted in a massive tidal wave" when you don't have recourse to either advanced astronomy nor a basic understanding of how celestial objects displace water when they hit the ocean.


That's because there are stories of it worldwide.

Well the earth has been calculated to be 6000 years old by Christian theologians.

So an impact dating back 12800 years does not support the global flood theory from the bible either.

 

[Grant]

Shock? How dramatic. The media really loves that word, don't they..

"reeling" is another favorite

residents of the town are reeling in shock and horror having heard of the bird droppings seen on father basil's anglia

 

[Grant]

The trick was so convincing, it even fooled those that filled the vessel with water?

that kinda sounds familiar.
i recall reading about an individual who could walk on water, and also turn water into wine.
full scale trickery and deception

 

[EADC]

Just no. Basic science and facts prove you wrong.

science and facts? In a Bible thread you are lost my friend Rambo cares little for those

 

[MEIOT]

There there friend, come back when you are sober mkay?

Pathetic and very predictable reply.
Let me guess...you read the shite you posted about it being a big fish and not a whale and how chemical expulsions turned that woman to salt and then you realised just how dumb you are and your childish interpretation of your holy book is massively flawed?

Here's an opportunity to educate the rest about these chemical expulsions turning people in to salt. I'm intrigued how that shite works.

 

[buka001]

Or we can go to Psalm 93:1, 96:10, Samuel 2:8 or Job 9:6, where the Earth is flat and rests on large pillars, with Sea Monsters guarding the edges.

How does that work out logically, scientifically or even just practically?

 

[MEIOT]

Or we can go to Psalm 93:1, 96:10, Samuel 2:8 or Job 9:6, where the Earth is flat and rests on large pillars, with Sea Monsters guarding the edges.

How does that work out logically, scientifically or even just practically?

Or... we could just let stupid people keep on believing stupid things and call it a day.
If society shuns people that are willfully and unabashedly ignorant, uneducated and just downright stupid, we might make headway as a species.

 

[Unhappy438]

Dawkins is a good example of what is wrong with the world today and therein lies the tragic hypocrisy; trying to convert everyone else to his or her own world view.

Yes its Dawkins who is responsible for this, not the group threatening hell and eternal damnation if you don't subscribe to their views.

 

[Unhappy438]

Just no. Basic science and facts prove you wrong.

Rambo doesnt like science, i believe he wants it to fall.

 

[Christo4]

Same thing - I spelled it wrong.
You are correct.

Both are correct.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Rambo doesnt like science, i believe he wants it to fall.

Does seem like that at times

 

[buka001]

Rambo doesnt like science, i believe he wants it to fall.

Or history, such as the Holocaust.

Fairy tales written thousands of years ago, influenced by people who had no concept of pretty much anything is perfect though and beyond reproach and perfectly justifiable.