See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
That's quite a contrast to your earlier professed hatred for the Right. As is evident, I had my doubts.lexity said:
Yes, yes.....itchy trigger-finger.
Where's that cancel button?
You don't fool me. Let's see, now, the last time someone really felt a strong urge to cancel me, here, they waited until I said they sound just like a politician.
That's what literally did it.
And that was after someone else asked me a question about secession. Ha! And the mod fell for it hook, line and sinker.
You know it's totally relevant to the topic, and you aren't willing to acknowledge that. You couldn't even answer the question I asked about a peaceful solution that would make both blue and red totally happy.
I mean you emphasized your hatred for the right, in no uncertain terms(which I have zero truck with), but for some reason you want to use the force of the law to cling to them like they were your bossom-buddies.
It's logically inconsistent, Spock.
See this post for why it's relevant:
Joe Biden defeats Trump to win US election
Unusual thing to read from the politician. Just come in and squash the riot with force. Unusual? Since when and where?
I suspect, in desperation what could happen is that those who really want to see the hand of God protect this thread will start jumping up and down waving their arms, making a huge ruckus whilst mentioning the word secession as many times as possible. It would certainly be acting in bad faith, but let's see.
It's been in place for 245 years already... It's part of the pact of US democracy.
The peaceful transfer of power.
One side wins, the other loses. Power is transferred from one party to the other. Folks get over it, on with their lives, and try do better four years later.
This talk of coups, is funny... since the more effective coup, in line with World Communist strategy, following events up to 1989, is not a hard coup. It's a soft coup.Donnie broke the pact with an attempted coup.
As an aside, I can't fathom what a snowflake you must be if your response to losing an election that happens every four years, is to secede, rather that simply continue living with folk you've always lived with, whose views might not match yours exactly... All the time.
Every four years.
99.99% of whom you'll never meet.
100% whose views you'll never know unless you specifically ask them.
It's a level of self indulgent emotion, entitlement, offence and victimhood that's utterly beyond me.
Such an equivocating solipsism.more than happy with that, so you agree the election outcome is not proven to be reliable nor unreliable?
personally that's not a situation I'd be happy with inaugurating a new president with a **** tonne of allegations flying around, I'd want to examine first
<snipped tinfoil hat rant>
And here you are with your pitch-forks when a few Right-wing stalwarts launch an unorganized, disjointed obviously inept 'hard coup attempt', in response to a highly-suspicious election result.
<snipped tinfoil hat rant>
And am sure the ones that were dodgy were thrown out of court, just like those 60 or so brought up by Trump supperters.
Personally, allegations should be measured on the reliability/credibility of the people making them, not simply whether there are a "**** tonne of them flying around".
I love how Biden's hard acceleration on money printing to the tune of $7 trillion is just a tin-foil hat rant.What do you base this assertion on?
I'm happy that you're happy.*supporters...lol
This from the person who strayed into the weeds of "off-topic" talking about the #Metoo movement in a US election thread?Seriously though, you're shifting the goalposts as the post quoted below specifically refers to allegations and the #metoo/#timesup movement specifically said #believeallwomen which the usual suspects around here cheered on gleefully.