- Apr 18, 2010
See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
Sure, but there needs to be something to investigate (prima facie evidence). People making schit up doesn't count. The vast majority of the claims from Trumpets are plainly absurd with zero supporting prima facie evidence.Which still qualifies it as a claim that needs to be investigated.
WASHINGTON — On Dec. 8, someone made a simultaneous transfer of 28.15 bitcoins — worth more than $500,000 at the time — to 22 different virtual wallets, most of them belonging to prominent right-wing organizations and personalities.
Now cryptocurrency researchers believe they have identified who made the transfer, and suspect it was intended to bolster those far-right causes. U.S. law enforcement is investigating whether the donations were linked to the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.
While the motivation is difficult to prove, the transfer came just a month before the violent riot in the Capitol, which took place after President Trump invited supporters to “walk down Pennsylvania Avenue” and “take back our country.”
Right-wing figures and websites, including VDARE, the Daily Stormer and Nick Fuentes, received generous donations from a bitcoin account linked to a French cryptocurrency exchange, according to research done by software company Chainalysis, which maintains a repository of information about public cryptocurrency exchanges and whose tools aid in government, law enforcement and private sector investigations. Chainalysis investigated the donations after Yahoo News shared the data points about the transaction.
I like her, and she says roughly the right things on transport, although nothing on her website? Bit bizarre. And she's been very quiet and mushy on improving housing supply. I like the eviction protection stuff, but her mentioning "community planning" is a big red flag. It's NIMBY bait, used to stifle proper upzoning and supply increase that's vital.Sorry, already on Team Maya.
$1400? What happened to $2000? Or is this an addition to the $600 from the previous bill?
There seems to be some weird confusion about this. Some people thought it meant $2600. Although I never thought it did.That thing you just said. $1400 + $600 = $2000.
Mr. Sanders said in the interview that he wanted an initial, emergency stimulus package to be “big.” He thinks it must include an additional $1,400 in direct payments for adults and children, on top of the $600 that Congress just passed
With you on this.There seems to be some weird confusion about this. Some people thought it meant $2600. Although I never thought it did.
Sanders doesn't, either, FWIW.
To the chagrin of Republicans, the democratic socialist senator will play a central role in shepherding Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s agenda through Congress.www.nytimes.com
I always understood it to mean, "$600 isn't enough, it should be $2000". Which is what it seems to be.
"Jess, this is what we trained for. Ok? Bison horns? Check. MAGA hat. Check. Clown paint? Check. Who has the 75 swords? Darrel? Where the **** is Darrel? Darrel?"
"I was in the john, Terry. It's the burritos. You know I have a sensitive digestive system. We've spoken about this."
"Jesus, Darrel. Just get in line. Where the **** are the swords? Let's go again: bison horns? Check -"
"Jesus ****ing Christ. What, Bob?"
"Terry, the floor plans say we're on the first floor. Q said all the children are in a basement, though. Underneath, kinda."
"What's your point, Bob?"