Jury in Apple v. Samsung Goofed

ebudae

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
393
If the jury instructions [PDF] are as long and complex as they were in this case, a quick verdict can indeed mean it shirked its duty. For example, if the jury rushed so much it assigned $2 million dollars to Apple, and then had to subtract it because there was no infringement, it raises a valid question: what was the basis for any of the damages figures the jury came up with? If they had any actual basis, how could they goof like this? Was there a factual basis for any of the damages figures?

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2012082510525390
 
Top