Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

jack_spratt

Expert Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
4,556
A jury has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones

Link
 

Techne

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
12,851
The story is mostly bs, no mainstream site will carry it (not even fox). Only place you will see mention of it is on conservative/religious sites while the dad begs for donations. The story does not match up to court records.

Gosh, what an endorsement, you mean the Fake News Media won't carry a story...:X3::D
Good to see there are still good people condemning this "transitioning" of children as pure child abuse and hatred.
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,188
No at 7 there's no way the child can fully understand and will regret it later.
This is a custody battle. It's sad what the mother wants to do once the custody battle tips in her favour. Kid is too young to even understand what's going on around him. Kids do and want all sorts of weird stuff.
 

wbot

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
9,744
WTF?! Court ORDERS dad to now refer to his son as Luna. What business is it of strangers to order a dad what he should or shouldn't call his own son?

Dad tries to protect son from mutilation, 'Murica says no! Feminazis rejoice!
 

supersunbird

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
60,152
The story is mostly bs, no mainstream site will carry it (not even fox). Only place you will see mention of it is on conservative/religious sites while the dad begs for donations. The story does not match up to court records.

So what does the court records say or is there no court records cause it's fake?
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,485
This is a custody battle. It's sad what the mother wants to do once the custody battle tips in her favour. Kid is too young to even understand what's going on around him. Kids do and want all sorts of weird stuff.

If a sex change operation is universally agreed upon as being nothing more than the mutilation of ones private parts the custody battle is pretty much a closed case.

But SJW rhetoric pushes this idea that male and female are subjective social constructs.

This is what makes this story (The real story) scary.
 

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,199
Nothing but child abuse...
As The Texan previously reported, the factors that convinced Georgulas that her son is really her daughter include his affinity for the movie “Frozen” and his request to get a “girl toy” from McDonald’s. She also says he started expressing a wish to dress in girl’s clothing. But Jeff Younger recently explained in an interview that if James ever had any desire to wear dresses, it’s only because his mother started putting him in dresses and painting his nails when he was just 3-years-old. He claims that she used several other methods of manipulation, including locking the boy in his room and telling him that “the monsters only eat boys.” Jeff speculates that Georgulas would withhold affection from James if he did not act like a girl.


The court case revolved around Jeff’s efforts to rescue his sons (James and his twin brother) from the abuse of this sick and twisted woman. However, the decision was passed down yesterday, and the court ruled against the father. Virtually all control over James and his brother have now been handed to Georgulas. She is free to continue his “social transition” into a girl — a process already well under way, as he goes by “Luna” and poses as a girl at his mother’s house and at school. Eventually she can, and presumably will, start James on drugs to chemically castrate him. There is nothing his father can do to stop it, short of “kidnapping” the boy and fleeing the country (a move that would be not only morally justified, but heroic).

It should be noted that, according to Jeff, James “violently refuses” to wear girl clothes when he is at his father’s house. Free from the clutches of his mother, Jeff says, James is relieved to act like a boy, dress like a boy, and play like a boy. The mother claims the opposite, insisting that James is excited to return to his mother and his identity as “Luna.” I think both claims are probably true, in a sense. The poor boy realizes that it pleases his mother for him to be Luna, and so he “wants” to play that role for her sake.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/wals...s-dads-wishes-this-is-evil-insane-child-abuse
 

grok

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
28,737
Dr. Georgulas testified today James and Jude are not actually biologically related to her. They were created through in-vitro fertilization and the couple used an egg donor.

So they're not even related to her by blood, and yet the courts gave the kids & sole decision making to her?

Now tell me again how the supposed impartial courts don't continue to favour women in custody cases..
 

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,271
Well she better hope the child does not regret it later in life. Because if so then she will carry all the guilt.
I mean what? Did she have the child sign a contract releasing her from liability? Preposterous. He's a minor. A decision like this should wait at least until the age of consent.
I can't find any indication online on why anybody involved thinks the kid is transgender, or whether he himself wishes to be a girl. Definitely no indication that the kid understands the medical risks involved.
 
Top