JUST IN | US Supreme Court ends constitutional right to abortion

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,105
You're right. The moral case against abortion makes no sense to someone whose primary values are economic, utilitarian or consequentialist. For those people, everything - including the value of every human life - is a financial or pragmatic calculus. For them there are no absolutes or principles, so they are unable to think in terms of objective principles. In the final analysis, they cannot coherently arrive at objective Right and Wrong, and so are reduced to splutters of personal preference where their will legitimates any action they desire. They have lobotomised themselves, so their desire and will is the final arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil.

This is not a view to which I subscribe.

Your ideas about right and wrong, are wrong.

You take your subjective morals and pretend they are objective, all whilst ignoring them yourself.

What nonsensical garbage.
 

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
Your ideas about right and wrong, are wrong.

You take your subjective morals and pretend they are objective, all whilst ignoring them yourself.

What nonsensical garbage.
Haha. I'm wrong and you're right, eh! Hahaha. What a giveaway. You implicitly deny the very reality of objective truth and in the same breath claim that I'm wrong. Yikes - how does a total subjectivist like you get such knowledge of objective reality?!

On your own terms you can't possibly make such statement and remain intellectually credible. Your view is incoherent, internally inconsistent.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,105
Haha. I'm wrong and you're right, eh! Hahaha. What a giveaway. You implicitly deny the very reality of objective truth and in the same breath claim that I'm wrong. Yikes - how does a total subjectivist like you get such knowledge of objective reality?!

On your own terms you can't possibly make such statement and remain intellectually credible. Your view is incoherent, internally inconsistent.

The fact that you're talking kak is objectively true, not objectively moral.

Seems you're more confused than wrong. But rest assured, you are both.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
You're right. The moral case against abortion makes no sense to someone whose primary values are economic, utilitarian or consequentialist. For those people, everything - including the value of every human life - is a financial or pragmatic calculus. For them there are no absolutes or principles, so they are unable to think in terms of objective principles. In the final analysis, they cannot coherently arrive at objective Right and Wrong, and so are reduced to splutters of personal preference where their will legitimates any action they desire. They have lobotomised themselves, so their desire and will is the final arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil.

This is not a view to which I subscribe.
The pragmatic argument against abortion is that recklessness and lack of responsibility leads to societal decline and eventual collapse.

It is just all the contradictory regressive talking points that is very superficial, and not based in any sound logic.
 

rh1

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
7,315
Educate yourself on a baby development, not debating abortion but simply giving facts:
 

Gyre

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
9,929
Twitter troll: "Amazon employees demanding they cease doing business in states where abortion is illegal and requesting time off"

Actual letter right below that: "Here are some proposed ideas we have come up with"

This guy takes blatant lying to a new level.

It's a female alt-right estate agent with a twitter account, lying and using people is their job :p
 

GrootVoet

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
1,489
I cant believe we still going strong after 997 posts. Has anything changed since SCOTUS has spoken.
 
Top