tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,105
You're right. The moral case against abortion makes no sense to someone whose primary values are economic, utilitarian or consequentialist. For those people, everything - including the value of every human life - is a financial or pragmatic calculus. For them there are no absolutes or principles, so they are unable to think in terms of objective principles. In the final analysis, they cannot coherently arrive at objective Right and Wrong, and so are reduced to splutters of personal preference where their will legitimates any action they desire. They have lobotomised themselves, so their desire and will is the final arbiter of right and wrong, good and evil.
This is not a view to which I subscribe.
Your ideas about right and wrong, are wrong.
You take your subjective morals and pretend they are objective, all whilst ignoring them yourself.
What nonsensical garbage.
