How did you get to that stupid deduction?
Bush and Blair went into Iraq under the pretence of a
preemptive strike, to prevent Sadam from developing (or already developed) and so using those weapons of mass destruction.
Do you remember Colin Powell doing his best to sell the WMD's nonsense to the UN Council!!!?
How do I come to that conclusion -- if there were no WMD's (as we now know there weren't) then the US and UK government
conspired to go into Iraq under false pretences -- ie. that's a frikken conspiracy buddy!!!! Wake up.
The fact that there was scud missiles and chemical weapons was used in the North was evidence that such weapons existed or that theier regime had such notions,
Weapons that were
destroyed years ago in the first Gulf War!!! You're promoting punishment for past events? Well send in the troops to SA then.....
whatever happened with the rest of the arsenal if ever there was more I do not know and do not care,
the fact the a devil was uncrowned is enough for me. I am more concerned about the local travesties than International US conspiracy bullsheet
You of course don't realise the scope of this do you. You are effectively giving the US carte blanche to invade whatever country they see fit as long as a "devil was uncrowned". What if Zuma, Mugabe or
any other leader around the world is considered by them to be a "devil".
Do you know that the US passed a law in congress based on the Kony 2012 bull$hit.....
I would say that world financial meltdown has global (and local) ramifications wouldn't you

I fear if it wasn't for our apartheid-era Exchange Control Laws, South Africa would have felt the 2008 collapse a lot worse. Ah well at least those apartheid bums done something right....
Please tell me you're not like this guy

(at 1:17:25)
[video=youtube;vrXgLhkv21Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=vrXgLhkv21Y#t=4644s[/video]