Kamala Harris announced as Biden's running mate

1980 - Voetspore van jaden - Apartheid was right
1994 - Voetspore van jaden - Apartheid was wrong
Oh Voetspore, you are such a hypocrite.

1940 - Ze Nazi - Hitler was right
1950 - Ze Nazi - Hitler was wrong
Oh Ze Nazi, you are such a hypocrite.
It's really clever actually. They play both sides at once. The know the radicals running around in the streets will not vote in anycase.

So having a tough on crime VP and futre president sends a great message to the more realistic Democrat voters that they haven't gone completely crazy.
 
It's really clever actually. They play both sides at once. The know the radicals running around in the streets will not vote in anycase.

So having a tough on crime VP and futre president sends a great message to the more realistic Democrat voters that they haven't gone completely crazy.
I don't know what you mean. My intent of this to highlight there is no hypocrisy if I change my position in x years. I am a human being and will change. Sometimes for good, sometimes for bad. Are we not allowed to change our position at all? I am not a flipping bible/quran/geeta.
 
I wonder if all the people on MyBB pearl clutching about the treatment of Harris gave two shits about old Sarah Palin.


She has been called a ‘freak show,’ a ‘joke,’ an ‘extreme liability,’ a ‘turncoat b*tch,’ an ‘insult,’ a ‘fire-breather,’ ‘xenophobic,’ a ‘sitcom of a vice-presidential choice,’ a ‘disaster movie,’ a ‘shallow’ person, ‘chirpy,’ a ‘provincial,’ a ‘disgrace to women’ who was ‘as fake as they come,’ a ‘nauseating,’ ‘cocky wacko,’ a ‘jack in the box,’ ‘Napoleon in bunny boots,’ ‘extreme,’ ‘radical,’ a ‘vessel,’ a ‘farce,’ ‘Bush in drag,’ ‘not very bright,’ ‘utterly unqualified,’ a ‘bimbo,’ ‘Danielle Quayle,’ the ‘new spokesperson for bellicosity and confrontation,’ a ‘fatal cancer,’ ‘like a really bad Disney movie,’ ‘laughable,’ an ‘odd combination of Chauncey Gardiner from Being There and Marge from Fargo,’ ‘dangerous,’ a ‘bully,’ the ‘biggest demagogue in America,’ the ‘Paleolithic Princess of Parsimonious Patriotism,’ the ‘anti-Wonder Woman,’ ‘judgmental’… ‘dictatorial’ with a ‘superior religious self-righteousness,’ a ‘racist’ who was ‘absurd,’ ‘scary,’ and a ‘token,’ a ‘bantamweight cheerleader,’ an ‘airhead,’ an ‘idiot,’ a ‘librarian in a porn film,’ a ‘Jesus freak,’ a ‘man with a vagina’… a ‘Drama Queen,’ a ‘Republican blow-up doll’ who ‘ideologically’ is ‘their hardcore pornographic centerfold spread,’ an ‘opportunistic anti-female,’ a ‘true Stepford candidate, a cyborg,’ a ‘quitter,’ and—this list is by no means exhaustive—a ‘bonbon.’
 
You're fixating on fiction, science is objective and does not care about anyone's feelings, including mine.

The only part that remains is what each individual's belief / delusion is, I have no interest whatsoever to cure their delusions, they are free to indulge in them forever.

My belief is to side with science, and it is my right not to pander to delusions.
And yet the science on gender is not exactly binary either.

Intersex people say hi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STS
This is a painful exchange. This guy has not the faintest idea what you are saying @Emjay.
Has to be cognitive dissonance in overdrive, because it's not that difficult to understand.
Was it as painful as that time you looked down on a whole population and used the same argument and rationalisation, that a terrorist used in his manifesto, a few weeks later?

When you said this -

It's rather ignorant of you to do so because the failure of African people to flourish as Asians have is down to two possibilities:

1. DNA
2. Behaviors and values (IE, culture)

And then the Neo-Nazi terrorist, Tobias Rathjen said this, just before he shot and killed 11 people and injured 5 more -

As of today, however, very few nations or races have emerged positively, while other races and cultures have not only made no contribution here, but are destructive – especially Islam. Hence my conclusion to eliminate the countries with their populations so that mankind has a chance at all to solve the riddle, because this will certainly not be possible in the presence of a numerically superior majority of idiots ... claiming certain races can be scientifically proved to be superior to others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STS
Was it as painful as that time you looked down on a whole population and used the same argument and rationalisation, that a terrorist used in his manifesto, a few weeks later?

When you said this -



And then the Neo-Nazi terrorist, Tobias Rathjen said this, just before he shot and killed 11 people and injured 5 more -

woah, who said anything about wanting to eliminate people ?
 
And yet the science on gender is not exactly binary either
More than willing to concede that actual hermaphrodites have a physical challenge that can cause a lot of anguish

Given that the science is not binary in that case, or at the very least quite ambiguous, it seems only fair to be a bit more understanding. Not like they chose it or anything.
 
woah, who said anything about wanting to eliminate people ?
The terrorist justified a call to slaughter using the differences culture and IQ as the basis thereof.

Brended arguing for race superiority on the same basis of culture and IQ.
 
I don't know what you mean. My intent of this to highlight there is no hypocrisy if I change my position in x years. I am a human being and will change. Sometimes for good, sometimes for bad. Are we not allowed to change our position at all? I am not a flipping bible/quran/geeta.

Nope, you're only allowed to go from being a leftist to a centrist to being on the right (those who shan't be named). Those are the only changes allowed. Anything else makes you a hypocrite. The above change makes you a sensible person.
 
Was it as painful as that time you looked down on a whole population and used the same argument and rationalisation, that a terrorist used in his manifesto, a few weeks later?

When you said this -



And then the Neo-Nazi terrorist, Tobias Rathjen said this, just before he shot and killed 11 people and injured 5 more -
You seem to be arguing that because a neo-Nazi said it, if it is true, it is also racist.
 
The terrorist justified a call to slaughter using the differences culture and IQ as the basis thereof.

Brended arguing for race superiority on the same basis of culture and IQ.

The Nazis passed some of the best anti animal cruelty laws, but they ended up killing millions.

I agree that culture is what seperates prosperous from non prosperous people, but that should be en encouragement for less of people to learn from those that are better off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STS
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter