Koeberg unit back online, Eskom curbs load shedding

Chris.Geerdts

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
2,251
Good news for once. That's great to have the extra 930MW back online. I was wondering when this would be announced, as it was originally mentioned for 'late-May', but 2 June is not bad in the bigger scheme of things. I wonder if they are using that extra GW to take other gennies offline for maintenance, or to reduce that massive diesel cost?
 

koeksGHT

Dealer
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
11,857
We have had plenty of Stage 2 which is upto 2000MW, can't expect any difference in load shedding.
 

Mortymoose

Honorary Master
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
13,287
I always thought that I was far away from any nuclear threat....... after reading the above article I started to research where all the waste was going.....

FFS! this place is two and a half hour drive from my back door..... I reckon i am the closest forumite to all this rusting waste....

"Vaalputs is the only South African radioactive waste-disposal facility, called the Vaalputs Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, operated by NECSA.[1] The facility is located about 100 km south-east of Springbok,[2] in the Northern Cape. It covers an area of approximately 10,000 hectare, measuring 16,5 km from east to west and 6,5 km from north to south at its narrowest point.
Approximately 1,000 hectare is occupied by sites developed for low- and intermediate-level waste,[2] an interim spent nuclear fuel storage facility, housing, roads, power lines and an airstrip. Vaalputs lies smothered between the Namaqualand in the west and the Bushmanland in the east.
During 1978 a programme to select a suitable site for the disposal of nuclear waste was commenced over large parts of South Africa. The programme leader had to keep a variety of socio-economic and geology related parameters in mind. Pioneer investigations indicated that the Northern Cape was the most feasible area. Supplementary studies showed that a place approximately 100 km southeast of Springbok was ideally suited for the disposal of low- and intermediate-level wastes.[2][3] In 1983 three farms were acquired by the state on behalf of the NECSA, which now constitute the Vaalputs Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility. The first low- and intermediate-level waste arrived from Koeberg in October 1986.[2][3]
Initially, silos were envisaged for dry storage of spent fuel from Koeberg. However the spent fuel from Koeberg is stored in reactor pools on the Koeberg site. These pools have been re-racked in order to facilitate lifetime storage of spent fuel.[4] Low and intermediate waste was buried in 10 meter deep trenches, which were filled with compacted soil, whereafter the surface was rehabilitated by planting local flora.[2] In June 1997 it was revealed that some uncovered containers had rusted and were leaking radioactivity. The National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) temporarily suspended operations, until the licencing conditions were met by the operators. The NNR established communication with local communities in September 2003."
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
We have had plenty of Stage 2 which is upto 2000MW, can't expect any difference in load shedding.

Medupi unit 6 is also producing intermittent power and isnt too far away from being fully operational so thats another 800MW
 

koeksGHT

Dealer
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
11,857
Medupi unit 6 is also producing intermittent power and isnt too far away from being fully operational so thats another 800MW

So we can just manage summer, now to see with winter and the 1200W heater between my legs.
 

Sonic2k

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,637
Well they can't manage
We were loadshed at exactly 5:00pm
Running on generator entire same area that normally goes out with loadshedding is currently out

F**k Julle ANC naaiers
 

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
Well they can't manage
We were loadshed at exactly 5:00pm
Running on generator entire same area that normally goes out with loadshedding is currently out

F**k Julle ANC naaiers
Must be a normal power outage. Eskom is not load shedding today.
 

Sonic2k

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,637
I call BS
Power outages don't happen at exactly 17:00:00 do they
 

jansdejager

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,002
FFS! this place is two and a half hour drive from my back door..... I reckon i am the closest forumite to all this rusting waste....

what are you driving?

tron_bike_3.jpg
 
Last edited:

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
I call BS
Power outages don't happen at exactly 17:00:00 do they
They can. Your local authority might have scheduled maintenance. This weekend mine does, from 07h00 till 18h00. But today it definitely wasn't Eskom load shedding.
 

Sonic2k

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,637
Power came back at exactly 19:00:36
I leave you to draw your own conclusions I am obviously wrong despite having lived here all my life and being aware that maintenance usually gets done in the middle of the night
 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,363
I always thought that I was far away from any nuclear threat....... after reading the above article I started to research where all the waste was going.....

FFS! this place is two and a half hour drive from my back door..... I reckon i am the closest forumite to all this rusting waste....

I reckon you deserve an extra couple of toots....
 

Kraken676

Active Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
78
I always thought that I was far away from any nuclear threat....... after reading the above article I started to research where all the waste was going.....

FFS! this place is two and a half hour drive from my back door..... I reckon i am the closest forumite to all this rusting waste....

"Vaalputs is the only South African radioactive waste-disposal facility, called the Vaalputs Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, operated by NECSA.[1] The facility is located about 100 km south-east of Springbok,[2] in the Northern Cape. It covers an area of approximately 10,000 hectare, measuring 16,5 km from east to west and 6,5 km from north to south at its narrowest point.
Approximately 1,000 hectare is occupied by sites developed for low- and intermediate-level waste,[2] an interim spent nuclear fuel storage facility, housing, roads, power lines and an airstrip. Vaalputs lies smothered between the Namaqualand in the west and the Bushmanland in the east.
During 1978 a programme to select a suitable site for the disposal of nuclear waste was commenced over large parts of South Africa. The programme leader had to keep a variety of socio-economic and geology related parameters in mind. Pioneer investigations indicated that the Northern Cape was the most feasible area. Supplementary studies showed that a place approximately 100 km southeast of Springbok was ideally suited for the disposal of low- and intermediate-level wastes.[2][3] In 1983 three farms were acquired by the state on behalf of the NECSA, which now constitute the Vaalputs Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility. The first low- and intermediate-level waste arrived from Koeberg in October 1986.[2][3]
Initially, silos were envisaged for dry storage of spent fuel from Koeberg. However the spent fuel from Koeberg is stored in reactor pools on the Koeberg site. These pools have been re-racked in order to facilitate lifetime storage of spent fuel.[4] Low and intermediate waste was buried in 10 meter deep trenches, which were filled with compacted soil, whereafter the surface was rehabilitated by planting local flora.[2] In June 1997 it was revealed that some uncovered containers had rusted and were leaking radioactivity. The National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) temporarily suspended operations, until the licencing conditions were met by the operators. The NNR established communication with local communities in September 2003."

It is by no means a "nuclear threat", Vaalputs is used for the storage of Low-level waste (LLW), typically paper, rags, tools, clothing, filters containing trace quantities of short-lived nuclides, such as Cs-134, Co-58, Co-60, 59-Fe.

Measured half-lives of these nuclides:
Cesium 134 (Cs-134 = 2,06 years)
Cobalt 58 (Co-58 = 71 days)
Cobalt 60 (Co-60 = 5.23 years)
Iron 59 (Fe-59 = 44.5 days)

Where half-life refers to the time required for one half the atoms of a given amount of a radioactive substance to disintegrate.

For example: If an item contained 100g of Fe-59, after 44.5 days it would contain 50g of Fe-59

Additionally, all this waste is compacted and mixed with concrete before it is stored at Vaalputs. The reason for this, is in order to stop any gamma rays emitted from nuclides such as Co-60, from escaping the concrete enclosure (and by extension this stops alpha and beta radiation as well, which has much less penetrating power as opposed to gamma rays).

Technicalities aside - if by "nuclear threat" you or any forum members thought "nuclear explosions/weapons, etc", rest assured that this is not possible to do with the waste stored at Vaalputs.
 

Chris.Geerdts

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
2,251
It is by no means a "nuclear threat", Vaalputs is used for the storage of Low-level waste (LLW), typically paper, rags, tools, clothing, filters containing trace quantities of short-lived nuclides, such as Cs-134, Co-58, Co-60, 59-Fe.

Measured half-lives of these nuclides:
Cesium 134 (Cs-134 = 2,06 years)
Cobalt 58 (Co-58 = 71 days)
Cobalt 60 (Co-60 = 5.23 years)
Iron 59 (Fe-59 = 44.5 days)

Where half-life refers to the time required for one half the atoms of a given amount of a radioactive substance to disintegrate.

For example: If an item contained 100g of Fe-59, after 44.5 days it would contain 50g of Fe-59

Additionally, all this waste is compacted and mixed with concrete before it is stored at Vaalputs. The reason for this, is in order to stop any gamma rays emitted from nuclides such as Co-60, from escaping the concrete enclosure (and by extension this stops alpha and beta radiation as well, which has much less penetrating power as opposed to gamma rays).

Ok, so the baddie in the mix is the Cobalt-60. Is it true then that 12% of any Co-60 that leaked out from rusted containers in 1997 is still active and seeping further into the water table (much as that exists in that area)? As the Co-60 fills the site, the average radioactivity must be increasing, and the concrete would slow down, rather than prevent the gamma radiation.
 

chromedome

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
1,838
In June 1997 it was revealed that some uncovered containers had rusted and were leaking radioactivity. The National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) temporarily suspended operations, until the licencing conditions were met by the operators.

I suppose they fixed them.
 
Top