Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all counts

[access]

You do know, I JUST explained the definition of race and completely ignore it.

Definition of RACE

any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry; also : the fact of dividing people, or of people being divided, into such groups : categorization by race… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

A: any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry

B: a group of people sharing a common cultural, geographical, linguistic, or religious origin or background

never asked for a definition of race.

i did ask why you limited privilege to race.

in your opinion, do you believe the privileged and the underprivileged can exist within the same race?

 

[Emjay]

https://nymag.com/strategist/article/where-to-donate-for-black-lives-matter.html

Whites must use their privilege to get the privilege of racial forgiveness for their father's and grandfather's actions.

 

[Emjay]

Some people should say no more often and force their lazy relatives out of the house.

Yeah, let's force old people out onto the streets. They should stop being so lazy, and old. Maybe we should also lower the working age to 10? 12? That should cure them of their laziness. The ill should also stop being so darn lazy too.

 

[wizardofid]

never asked for a definition of race.

i did ask why you limited privilege to race.

in your opinion, do you believe the privileged and the underprivileged can exist within the same race?

Lol. Okay a thicc boy. You do know it can mean a person, of native American origin, it could mean a person of Asian decent, "He is from polish decent, the race of polish people."
Race doesn't describe skin color, it is a collective noun, it describes a group of people, it is essentially a neutral word that describes a group of people anywhere in world. So your question whether or not it is limited to race makes zero sense.As race can literally mean any ethnicity anywhere in the world. Race by definition doesn't imply a specific race, gender, or species. Your question doesn't compute.

in your opinion, do you believe the privileged and the underprivileged can exist within the same race?

Do I have to answer more dumb questions ? I think not.

 

[Bobbin]

I could ask you Are you daft/or trolling, does it seem like a good idea.
So how would you go about fixing inequality ?

Fixing moral equality (Treating everyone as an equal/responsible individual) or material equality (Giving everyone the same things)?

Because as far as I can tell the two don't necessarily correlate. And if you force the latter you are breaking the former. We don't force our equals.

So which one we looking at?

 

[Benedict A55h0le]

So how would you go about fixing inequality ?

Step 1 is to kill everyone and then clone the same male and female so that all humans are the same genetically.

 

[wizardofid]

Fixing moral equality (Treating everyone as an equal/responsible individual) or material equality (Giving everyone the same things)?

Because as far as I can tell the two don't necessarily correlate. And if you force the latter you are breaking the former.

Yes, which is why I don't have any idea where to start fixing. The hatred people have for one another seems deep seeded.

 

[wizardofid]

Step 1 is to kill everyone and then clone the same male and female so that all humans are the same genetically.

The last time someone tried it a holocaust happened and that didn't end well . Lol we are pretty much genetically the same, the difference is about 0.1%. Chimpanzees have more genetic diversity then we do at 1.2%.

 

[Benedict A55h0le]

The last time someone tried it a holocaust happened and that didn't end well . Lol we are pretty much genetically the same, the difference is about 0.1%. Chimpanzees have more genetic diversity then we do at 1.2%.

The fact you are missing is that there is a very significant difference in genetics. I will never be a pro golfer, just don`t have ball sense genetically. I am also an dumb ugly pigman and don`t get chicks and don`t have the IQ for high paying jobs. So how do we fix this inequality? The answer is to kill me and only let 1 superior male clone to reproduce.

 

[Zyzzyva]

 

[Bobbin]

Yes, which is why I don't have any idea where to start fixing. The hatred people have for one another seems deep seeded.

Sociopathy is present in all of us. We lack a common cultural framework and/or moral understanding (sorta like a religion or movement maybe?) that binds us together, gives trust and deals with our inherently corrupt nature.

I suspect partly to blame is how we've thrown all sorts of cultures into one bag irresponsibly and just let them fight it out. We call it democracy, but it's more akin to a massive cockfighting arena. And the corrupt politicians stir it up by creating further divide which we in turn reward, thanks again to our own sociopathy.

My 2 cents. Speak under correction though.

 

[wizardofid]

The fact you are missing is that there is a very significant difference in genetics. I will never be a pro golfer, just don`t have ball sense genetically. I am also an dumb ugly pigman and don`t get chicks and don`t have the IQ for high paying jobs. So how do we fix this inequality? The answer is to kill me and only let 1 superior male clone to reproduce.

That would actually be a bad thing.Imagine taking a photo copy and then making a photocopy of the photocopy and do it over and over.It will exponentially degrade.Your clone sister may say yes, but inbreeding or incest is never a good thing concerning genes
.

Good example when you don't have enough genetic diversity in a group, is if you have a look at the Amish, and their general health. That 0.1% might have given us Einstein or Epstein, but is enough to not devolve like above.

 

[wizardofid]

Sociopathy is present in all of us. We lack a common cultural framework and/or moral understanding (sorta like a religion or movement maybe?) that binds us together, gives trust and deals with our inherently corrupt nature.

I suspect partly to blame is how we've thrown all sorts of cultures into one bag irresponsibly and just let them fight it out. We call it democracy, but it's more akin to a massive cockfighting arena. And the corrupt politicians stir it up by creating further divide which we in turn reward, thanks again to our own sociopathy.

My 2 cents. Speak under correction though.

Maybe becoming a serial killer isn't a bad thing

 

[rietrot]

Yeah, let's force old people out onto the streets. They should stop being so lazy, and old. Maybe we should also lower the working age to 10? 12? That should cure them of their laziness. The ill should also stop being so darn lazy too.

Not what I said.

 

[access]

Lol. Okay a thicc boy. You do know it can mean a person, of native American origin, it could mean a person of Asian decent, "He is from polish decent, the race of polish people."
Race doesn't describe skin color, it is a collective noun, it describes a group of people, it is essentially a neutral word that describes a group of people anywhere in world. So your question whether or not it is limited to race makes zero sense.As race can literally mean any ethnicity anywhere in the world. Race by definition doesn't imply a specific race, gender, or species. Your question doesn't compute.


Do I have to answer more dumb questions ? I think not.

you said:

To put it simple if you are part of a race that in any way or form hampered another's ability to build wealth or same opportunity, then you are privileged.

no matter how much you try insult me or change the topic.

you are wrong.

 

[Gyre]

Step 1 is to kill everyone and then clone the same male and female so that all humans are the same genetically.

You just described Brackenfell

 

[Vrotappel]

The problem is that inequality was created by someone else, it was directly influenced, by baring people, from owning land, a house, better jobs, voting, ect, ect. The inequality was artificially created, if it naturally occurred as things do, fine it happens everywhere, aging infrastructure, housing, loss of jobs, businesses closing, a mine closes, there are many instances where it naturally occurred, which were beyond the control of people, But there is a case to be made for the artificially created inequality.

BS
Inequality existed before slaves were taken and before people established posts in Africa. Are you suggesting that Africans were equal to Europe before that point?

 

[Howdy]

The problem is that inequality was created by someone else, it was directly influenced, by baring people, from owning land, a house, better jobs, voting, ect, ect. The inequality was artificially created, if it naturally occurred as things do, fine it happens everywhere, aging infrastructure, housing, loss of jobs, businesses closing, a mine closes, there are many instances where it naturally occurred, which were beyond the control of people, But there is a case to be made for the artificially created inequality generalizing.

fixed

 

[wizardofid]

fixed

Fixed

 

[Emjay]

lol. This guy is just next level special.

Uses multiple ad homs while refusing to answer anything, but gets triggered by someone saying the problem is generalizations.

Can't make this **** up.