ToxicBunny
Oi! Leave me out of this...
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
- Messages
- 113,637
How does it not?With all due respect but that doesn't prove anything.
How does it not?With all due respect but that doesn't prove anything.
How does it not?
I don't trust a word that comes out of the mouth of anyone in government. I don't trust them to be truthful. I don't trust them to know anything. I don't trust them to say or do anything correctly.
Only one way to be sure they are telling the truth , present documents.
If all they have is memories and no paperwork then they are in the wrong.
Will this be the same excuse when the Constitution is changed and government starts expropriating without compensation? The people are lying because "we" do not believe a word that comes from government?
Documents - all those wanting their land back, what documents do they have ?
Expropriation by Municipalities/government for road building and other infrastructure has been around forever. It typically involved compensation, not always at a price land owners agreed with but the real problem here is it appears these people have been squatting for many decades and were to lazy to formalise the arrangement by making some kind of claim to get the title deeds. So when the Municipality needed this land for roads its was a no brainer, no incumbent so no consultation needed, let's build.
Granted someone cocked it up because the fact that there were people currently residing on the property would have been self evident, and I'm assuming an eviction order would legally be needed to remove the squatters?
Nirmala Devi Maharaj, 73, of Umhlali, inherited the land from her late mother, Jagataran Devi, who died 40 years ago.
“I was told they could not find our lot number on the map. However, I was able to identify our land as there is a river just below the property.”
He then realised the lot number had changed. However, the family was not told about this.
Expropriation by Municipalities/government for road building and other infrastructure has been around forever. It typically involved compensation, not always at a price land owners agreed with but the real problem here is it appears these people have been squatting for many decades and were to lazy to formalise the arrangement by making some kind of claim to get the title deeds. So when the Municipality needed this land for roads its was a no brainer, no incumbent so no consultation needed, let's build.
Granted someone cocked it up because the fact that there were people currently residing on the property would have been self evident, and I'm assuming an eviction order would legally be needed to remove the squatters?
now see this I believe is what has happened, and the reporter has latched on to 'expropriation' and either for headlines or through sheer bloody incompetence has confused it with EWC. (I'm inclined to believe the latter given the lack of any evidence of actual investigative reporting in the article)
However, the KwaDukuza Municipality media liaison officer, Sipho Mkhize, said: “The property is registered under the KwaDukuza Municipality. We can prove that the expropriation was done rightfully.”
ANC eyeing 31 KZN properties for expropriation, claims AfriForum
There are 31 KwaZulu-Natal properties, including farms, on a list of 190 earmarked for expropriation without compensation, according to AfriForum.
The civil rights organisation on Sunday published a list of 190 properties, which is more than the 139 that the ANC announced to have been targeted.
According to the list, the most farms have been targeted in North West (with 32 properties), followed by KZN (31).
Afriforum said in a statement that although the list is confidential, it had obtained a document being circulated in the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform as a list of farms that will serve as “test cases”. It does not contain the details of the 139 farms, but of 190 “properties”.
now see this I believe is what has happened, and the reporter has latched on to 'expropriation' and either for headlines or through sheer bloody incompetence has confused it with EWC. (I'm inclined to believe the latter given the lack of any evidence of actual investigative reporting in the article)
If they didn't own it, then no they didn't lose it. Astonishingly this is actually an important point.HTF is it any different. Somebody lost their property!
You probably don't own any property but I sure as hell hope the gov comes and takes yours the day you own property.
Probably none since the local people and the tribes which migrated from the north had no systems of writing .Documents - all those wanting their land back, what documents do they have ?
If this is proof of ownership then the world has clearly gone mad .![]()
In modern times you have to keep an eye out for upright coke cans, a pile of rocks, etc. outside of your house because you may be living in someone’s else’s property and that they may come along soon to expropriate their belongings. Nowadays, without compensation, they, like the KwaDukuza Municipality, may just come around and expropriate it.
I sure hope that the Khoisan are getting their documentation ready.Documents - all those wanting their land back, what documents do they have ?