DA-LION-619
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 13,777
I’m not sure where this info came from? Is this also from the police report that said he got out of the car then charged?Is that why he took his shoes off?
I’m not sure where this info came from? Is this also from the police report that said he got out of the car then charged?Is that why he took his shoes off?
This was after he entered the house. He took his shoes off when he entered the house. Later he went to his car.Is that why he took his shoes off?
That was inside the house. He'd clearly put them back on as we can see in the vid.Is that why he took his shoes off?
If you look at it as pulling the trigger sure, I see it as irresponsible use of a firearm especially in an unknown situation.What you describe is "literally' the complete antithesis of trigger happy.
Okay. That clears up why she said he's still in the car. Just wondering how these deductions are made.That was inside the house. He'd clearly put them back on as we can see in the vid.
I don't recall seeing a single armed police officer during my time in Japan. Their gun laws work pretty well.Sure about that?
![]()
Police officer shot dead at Croydon Custody Centre
The long-serving sergeant was an "inspiration to all who knew him", says one colleague.www.bbc.com
Or...
![]()
London officer shot dead while detaining suspect at station
A British police officer has been shot dead inside a London police station by a suspect he was detaining, who then appears to have turned the gun on himselfabcnews.go.com
Gun laws and restrictions only applies to law abiding citizens and not criminals. They never work in any country around the world.
The cops reacted pretty poorly, but he must have known they were cops from when they pulled up. Running at them like a crazy person is on his own shoulders.
"in an unknown situation". You said it. If a cop feels safe and sure during for instance a traffic stop, like when he asks a driver to put his hands out the window and the driver complies, he would probably not have to draw his gun. If the situation is unknown or may pose risk, the duty of the officer is to protect his own life and the lives of bystanders. Often drawing his gun necessitates this, especially in a country with 330m guns on the street.If you look at it as pulling the trigger sure, I see it as irresponsible use of a firearm especially in an unknown situation.
![]()
Definition of TRIGGER-HAPPY
irresponsible in the use of firearms; especially : inclined to shoot before clearly identifying the target; inclined to be irresponsible in matters that might precipitate war; aggressively belligerent in attitude… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
What deductions were made that you are have difficulties with?Okay. That clears up why she said he's still in the car. Just wondering how these deductions are made.
Which info?I’m not sure where this info came from? Is this also from the police report that said he got out of the car then charged?
She didn't say that. I heard "he's in the car" or somethingStill makes no sense, the police stories keep contradicting themselves, that woman said he was stealing the car so it’s not rocket science to release the full tapes and 911 call.
Cops pointed gun at an intruder as they should. That's not trigger happyIf you look at it as pulling the trigger sure, I see it as irresponsible use of a firearm especially in an unknown situation.
![]()
Definition of TRIGGER-HAPPY
irresponsible in the use of firearms; especially : inclined to shoot before clearly identifying the target; inclined to be irresponsible in matters that might precipitate war; aggressively belligerent in attitude… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
Not referring to your post specifically. Just referring to 17 pages of deductions made without facts. As far as I can see to date the only known facts are that a dude was in a property where the owner/tenant did not want him. The owner called the cops. The cops tried to detain him and he attacked them. They tried to subdue him with a tazer and a shot. He kept going for them and they killed him.What deductions were made that you are have difficulties with?
Cops pointed gun at an intruder as they should. That's not trigger happy
What do UK cops point at intruders ?
Some stuff comes from the body cam footage. Like officer 1 says 3 or 4 times to the lady "where he went?". The lady seems to have difficulty understanding that. It could be that she is in a panicked state but it could also be the sentence construction is a bit strange and slang'ish.Not referring to your post specifically. Just referring to 17 pages of deductions made without facts. As far as I can see to date the only known facts are that a dude was in a property where the owner/tenant did not want him. The owner called the cops. The cops tried to detain him and he attacked them. They tried to subdue him with a tazer and a shot. He kept going for them and they killed him.
Yeah no it's rediculous to compare a country like the US with so much gun violence and where everyone can carry a gun with the UK where intruders are far less likely to be armed with guns.What do UK cops point at intruders ?