mojoman
Executive Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 8,747
ObviouslySurely someone would have first needed to get him to get evaluated. Since we do not have government agents, anywhere in the world, who spend time with us each and every day and monitor our behaviour, I would almost think it would be the responsibility of those friends and family spending time with him each day to ensure he gets the help he needs.
Obviously
But what if this was the first time he went over the edge?
If you understood what a strawman argument was, you would not ask this question.I see the previous posts have been deleted.
The main point I am presenting is that the guy, ideally should have been treated psychologically.
I have already made my stance clear on the fact that he was responsible for his own death, the cops did not really have a choice.
How is me suggesting rehab as a possibility, interpreted as a strawman by you?
Is it impossible to help someone with a mental disorder?
I think we should let the experts make that claim..How many people is busy with average day life and suddenly, in a second, for no reason, just cross the edge and break down? I can't answer this question, but I am convinced that most Psychologists would agree that a long or short timeline of events and warning signs would rather precede such breakdown.
Even if not, such person is a danger to society if this is happening out of the blue.
You have convoluted the discussion into a series of unanswerable questions..If you understood what a strawman argument was, you would not ask this question.
There is your strawman...
What if "the experts" are idiots.I think we should let the experts make that claim..
Only unanswerable by YOU...You have convoluted the discussion into a series of unanswerable questions..
Your MO, make statement, if question is asked, respond with Strawman/Whataboutism etc.Only unanswerable by YOU...
Then we will have loadshedding tomorrow..What if "the experts" are idiots.
So explain what you want from me then??Your MO, make statement, if question is asked, respond with Strawman/Whataboutism etc.
Respectfully, I think it's best to just leave it, I will back offSo explain what you want from me then??
Do you want me to explain what a Strawman is?
Do you want me to explain why YOUR counter "argument" was a Strawman?
First you say this:Your MO, make statement, if question is asked, respond with Strawman/Whataboutism etc.
When it is discussed and shown to be a generalization, you backtrack furiously and start rephrasing with "in an ideal situation...bla bla bla.No, he should have been detained and provided psychiatric help.
OBVIOUSLY is it not impossible to help someone with a mental disorder. That is what psychologists, psychiatrists and mental hospitals are for.Is it impossible to help someone with a mental disorder?
Is that YOUR MO then....? Stirr the pot and then scurry away when facts and info become too much for your emotional outburst?Respectfully, I think it's best to just leave it, I will back off
Then we will have loadshedding tomorrow..
From "I will blow you head off" to "Loadshedding" ....
Only on mybroadband. Special.
Yup, thats it, you got itIs that YOUR MO then....? Stirr the pot and then scurry away when facts and info become too much for your emotional outburst?
So just ignoring my explanation of your strawman...an explanation you insisted on by the way?Yup, thats it, you got it
What if "the experts" are idiots.