Yes. Why wouldn't you?So you're saying I should consider an F20 M135i/M140i over the W176 Mercedes-AMG A45?
I'm halfway to that magic numberPeople usually get rid of them before problems start, my limited, personal experience is that issues start after 100k kms. A friend had timing chain issues on his 0.9T renault just before 100k kms.
Some people have better luck with minimal issues but generally small capacity turbo cars were never built to last no matter what some salesman tells you.
Hopefully you make it past and beyond, I was surprise how tiny the chain and pulleys are on the Renault, it really didn't inspire confidence, but maybe I am used to the old tech.I'm halfway to that magic number
I was actually surprised how punchy they are when I first drove a Clio.
those 1991 Mazda's are the longest surviving cars on our roads .....B3 engines....B for bomb proof.-So far a Mazda of 1998 300 000Km+ had proven to be the most reliable vehicle I ever had, however it never saw a dealer ever. Thats why I keep this as a backup as well.
-New Izuzu I hope to be reliable, so far it looks ok. Two dealers closed on me however since I got it and GM disappeared. Now I have to fish for a dealer again.
-The EU(German) car seemed to be the most unreliable filled with electronic jargon, however spare parts are readily available. It faired way better out of gurantee than within so far, but the imminent demise is probably not far away.
So now the big question come: How on earth is it possible with all the technocratic hype, all the digital greatness, all the perfect robotic manufacturing processes, a new vehicle(Many ways more costly) after 1998 can be produced that is worse than those years in reliability and survival-?those 1991 Mazda's are the longest surviving cars on our roads .....B3 engines....B for bomb proof.
For me there.s too many ECU's in the modern car,many cars have become rolling computers.An ECU goes wrong in the bush...what you do?Even these keys...loose your modern key in the bush...chaos.So now the big question come: How on earth is it possible with all the technocratic hype, all the digital greatness, all the perfect robotic manufacturing processes, a new vehicle(Many ways more costly) after 1998 can be produced that is worse than those years in reliability and survival-?
It's true that some manufacturers go out of their way to make sure cars are not user serviceable, replacing a battery means a trip to the dealer on some cars.For me there.s too many ECU's in the modern car,many cars have become rolling computers.An ECU goes wrong in the bush...what you do?Even these keys...loose your modern key in the bush...chaos.
They take away weight for extra mileage and lose strength......flimsy sheet metal and plastic.Besides the electronics I have found some recent cars to be generally not well built, even the trusted cars like Toyota, the new Toyota always has some loose plastics dangling under the engine bay, the Honda Jazz loses pieces ofthe interior trim as you drive.
Can't recall ever seeing it mentioned that Subaru diesels being particularly reliable, is it still a boxer type engine in their diesels?Came here to say that ^^
Those things are indestructible (Not literally, figure of speech)
Yes it's a boxer. The early ones had some crankshaft issues but that has been sortedCan't recall ever seeing it mentioned that Subaru diesels being particularly reliable, is it still a boxer type engine in their diesels?
Why are they so reliable?Yes it's a boxer. The early ones had some crankshaft issues but that has been sorted
renault - fantastic to drive - absolute disaster to own.thanks so much guys!
yea toyota seems to be mentioned a lot as the long laster and best, although it is also the most stolen vehicle.
these are the kinds ive been looking at:
![]()
WeBuyCars | Sell Cars For Cash | Free Online Vehicle Valuations
WeBuyCars offer free online valuations of your car, to make selling it convenient for you in a quick, efficient and safe way.www.webuycars.co.za
wish I knew more about cars to make an informed decision!
my friend has a Renault duster - i read those are highly economical![]()
They overengineer the hell out of them.Why are they so reliable?
Diesels can typically get horribly expensive when they go wrong, that's why I avoid them despite them having great power and low down torque. Subaru's automatics(CVT) also cost a fortune to repair when they break.
A diesel automatic Subaru could potentially get really expensive to maintain if things go wrong.
Interestingly Subaru are rated as one of the most reliable brands on the US and the highest resale value.
Digital overboard going is a phase that will water out as time goes on(By force), too much trust and money going into it.For me there.s too many ECU's in the modern car,many cars have become rolling computers.An ECU goes wrong in the bush...what you do?Even these keys...loose your modern key in the bush...chaos.