Lord of the Rings or Mirrors Edge?

[elL0L]

I can buy one of those 2. Which one do you recomend?

I like lotr, but in conquest the lore are broken too much. And multi is out of the question.

 

[DarthCat]

Mirrors Edge

 

[Magnarmalok]

what the kitty said

 

[adamr]

mirrors edge ... conquest ... seems k@k

 

[DeadCore]

have to agree,Mirrors Edge,Lord of the Rings seems to still use old tech

 

[StoneCold]

Mirror's Edge gets my vote as well

 

[elL0L]

I want lots of replay value in the game. I love LOTR and looked forward to conquest from 2008, but now it looks just like another piece of fantasy crap.

 

[Elev8r]

Mirror's Edge

 

[HANDsolo]

Neither

 

[DeadCore]

Mirror's edge beats LODR by far.

 

[Th0r]

Mirrors edge is a def winner, the LOTR conquest isnt as bad as everyone say, it also has 2 saix servers which is full all the time online which makes it fun to a certain degree.

But I would buy Mirrors edge (I bought LOTR conquest and would honestly say it isnt worth 400 bucks)

 

[Noah]

Mirrors Edge = awesome!!1!
Conquest = Kinda fun for the 1st 10 minutes.

 

[I am Penguin]

After the KZ2 demo I tried the mirors edge demo. Maybe the storyline is great/better but I deleted it after a few trials simply due to the graphics. Pathetic by modern day standards. I would rather consider GTA4 in this case.

 

[DeadCore]

Mirrors Edge graphics look awesome on my 9500GT

 

[elL0L]

Bought both.

Mirrors Edge, nice game, but to much bloom.

Lotr conquest, everything is good except the combat, the most important part.