mercurial

MyBB Legend
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
40,901
Reaction score
2,692
Location
/\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
LSD and magic mushrooms could heal damaged brain cells in people suffering from depression, study shows

Psychedelic drugs like LSD and ecstasy ingredient MDMA have been shown to stimulate the growth of new branches and connections between brain cells which could help address conditions like depression and addiction.

Researchers in California have demonstrated these substances, banned as illicit drugs in many countries, are capable of rewiring parts of the brain in a way that lasts well beyond the drugs' effects.

This means psychedelics could be the "next generation" of treatments for mental health disorders which could be more effective and safer than existing options, the study's authors from the University of California.

In previous studies by the same team, a single dose of DMT, the key ingredient in ayahuasca medicinal brews of Amazonian tribes, has been shown to help rats overcome a fear of electric shock meant to emulate post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Now they have shown this dose increases the number of branch-like dendrites sprouting from nerve cells in the rat's brain.

These dendrites end at synapses where their electrical impulses are passed on to other nerve cells and underpin all brain activity. But they can atrophy and draw back in people with mental health conditions.

“One of the hallmarks of depression is that the neurites in the prefrontal cortex – a key brain region that regulates emotion, mood, and anxiety – those neurites tend to shrivel up,” says Dr David Olson, who lead the research team.

These brain changes also appear in cases of anxiety, addiction, and post-traumatic stress disorder and stimulating them to reconnect could help to address this.

The research, published in the journal Cell Reports today, looked at drugs in several classes including tryptamines, DMT and magic mushrooms; amphetamines, including MDMA; and ergolines, like LSD.

In tests on human brain cells in the lab, flies and rats, it found these substances consistently boosted brain connections.

Dr Olson compared the effects to ketamine, another illicit drug which represents one of the most important new treatments for depression in a generation, and found many psychedelics have equal or greater effects.

A ketamine nasal spray is being fast-tracked through clinical trials after it was shown to rapidly relieve major depression and suicidal thoughts in people who cannot be helped by other treatments.

However its use has to be weighed against its potential for abuse, and its ability to cause a form of drug-induced psychosis.

“The rapid effects of ketamine on mood and plasticity are truly astounding,” said Dr Olson. “The big question we were trying to answer was whether or not other compounds are capable of doing what ketamine does.”

“People have long assumed that psychedelics are capable of altering neuronal structure, but this is the first study that clearly and unambiguously supports that hypothesis."

The fact that many of these drugs seem to mimic the groundbreaking benefits of ketamine opens up an array of new treatment options, which may be less open to abuse, if these drugs can make it to clinical trials.

Dr Olson said: “Ketamine is no longer our only option. Our work demonstrates that there are a number of distinct chemical scaffolds capable of promoting plasticity like ketamine, providing additional opportunities for medicinal chemists to develop safer and more effective alternatives.”

The news that yet more banned substances could help tackle serious and debilitating disease comes as the UK Home Office is embroiled in a row over medicinal cannabis in treating epilepsy.

After months seizure-free, 12-year-old Billy Caldwell had a seizure last night after airport customs officials confiscated his prescription from Canada.

Billy had previously had the UK’s only NHS medical cannabis prescription, for an oil which banished seizures that used to strike 100 times a day, but the Home Office intervened to block his GP from prescribing it.
 
I can only assume the mechanism by which such results are achieved isn't due to direct pharmacological (biochemical) effects on neurogenesis but rather due to the psychological effect they produce (mind) which then acts back on the body (resulting in physical brain changes).

It's maybe an arbitrary distinction to make, but I doubt these very different chemicals (mdma, psilocybin, lsd etc.) all produce the same direct effect on physical brain changes. It seems more likely they all induce vivid psychological states which then result in the aforementioned brain changes.

(mind, matter; matter, mind...chicken, egg)

How many doses are required to achieve 'boosting of brain connections'?
Is this different from, say, learning some skill like piano and observing the resulting neural growth?
Is this 'boosting of brain connections' specific to certain regions of the brain that's generally beneficial or is the growth very arbitrary?
 
Last edited:
ecstasy might help depression? gwaaaaan... really? :D
 
I can only assume the mechanism by which such results are achieved isn't due to direct pharmacological (biochemical) effects on neurogenesis but rather due to the psychological effect they produce (mind) which then acts back on the body (resulting in physical brain changes).

It's maybe an arbitrary distinction to make, but I doubt these very different chemicals (mdma, psilocybin, lsd etc.) all produce the same direct effect on physical brain changes. It seems more likely they all induce vivid psychological states which then result in the aforementioned brain changes.

How many doses are required to achieve 'boosting of brain connections'?
Is this different from, say, learning some skill like piano and observing the resulting neural growth?
Is this 'boosting of brain connections' specific to certain regions of the brain that's generally beneficial or is the growth very arbitrary?

Well how do you think the psychological effects occur? They occur because these chemicals change how your brain works for a brief period of time. Regions that don't normally connect together do connect together, and underused areas become active. Or something like that.

So I'd say you have it backwards.
 
Well how do you think the psychological effects occur? They occur because these chemicals change how your brain works for a brief period of time. Regions that don't normally connect together do connect together, and underused areas become active. Or something like that.

So I'd say you have it backwards.
Yeah I knew this would get tricky :p.

A silly analogy:

A frog is in a bucket of water, the faster it swims and kicks the warmer the water gets.
I can drop 3 different effervescent tablets into the water, each of which will aggravate the frog and cause it to swim.

Each tablet will result in varying degrees of water temp change, even though none of them directly causes it; their common action is to aggravate the frog. In the same way these drugs (through different mechanisms of action) induce psychological states which then result in brain changes. One could imagine any drug or stimulus capable of producing sustained psychological state changes as producing brain changes.

But yeah - maybe it's a distinction not worth making.
 
Yeah I knew this would get tricky :p.

A silly analogy:

A frog is in a bucket of water, the faster it swims and kicks the warmer the water gets.
I can drop 3 different effervescent tablets into the water, each of which will aggravate the frog and cause it to swim.

Each tablet will result in varying degrees of water temp change, even though none of them directly causes it; their common action is to aggravate the frog. In the same way these drugs (through different mechanisms of action) induce psychological states which then result in brain changes. One could imagine any drug or stimulus capable of producing sustained psychological state changes as producing brain changes.

But yeah - maybe it's a distinction not worth making.

The water changes first and the frog reacts to it.

The brain's activity changes first and that is what results in the altered psychological state.
 
The water changes first and the frog reacts to it.

The brain's activity changes first and that is what results in the altered psychological state.
I agree.
But it's then the psychological state that produces the 'boosting of brain connections'. I don't think one can have the 'boosting of brain connections' without the shift in psychology.
 
I have 10g of morning glory seeds for anyone who wants to try :p
Enough ergoline to reset anyone's brain.
 
Last edited:
The brain's activity changes first and that is what results in the altered psychological state.
I guess I was also just wondering how meaningful these brain changes are. If we had a drug that induced brain changes correlated to learning to play the piano and I took the drug and subsequently never touched a piano - yes, I'd have 'brain changes', but would they be generally beneficial?
 
I guess I was also just wondering how meaningful these brain changes are. If we had a drug that induced brain changes correlated to learning to play the piano and I took the drug and subsequently never touched a piano - yes, I'd have 'brain changes', but would they be generally beneficial?

Meaningful according to those who use the drugs. And there have been a lot of studies on what affect these drugs have - they seem to be mostly positive.

I for one am keen to try them one day.

These drugs would not induce changes related to a specific skill like playing the piano. That's nonsensical. But apparently they make your sense of self smaller - you realize not everything is about you.
 
These drugs would not induce changes related to a specific skill like playing the piano. That's nonsensical.
Yes, obviously.
If you took that literally I'm having a communication failure here.

I agree drugs can result in beneficial experiences (losing the sense of self, dealing with emotional trauma etc.). And yes, there's a sense in which sustaining such states would result in brain changes.

However, the bone I'm picking is the statement seen here and other articles where the benefit of these drugs is the 'boosting of brain connections'. The piano example was an analogy for the psychological experience: I might have a drug-induced experience of counting sheep for two hours or pondering the nature of hotdogs, which would have corresponding brain changes but again - those brain changes aren't what's beneficial, it's the experience.

These drugs produce psychological states (and subsequent neural correlates of those states) that might be beneficial. But they could also produce psychological states (and subsequent neural correlates of those states) that aren't beneficial. The focus shouldn't be on the physical brain changes, but rather on the experience that produces those changes.

It's the difference between taking lsd for a better brain and:

Making fart sounds for 7 hours, or
Being out in nature and contemplating the universe and life.

They both produce brain changes, but it's the experience that matters.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter