Thus society separates the curds from the whey.*disclaimer - i didn't watch the video.
Why end your life over cheese? Dude is gonna get a criminal record, he might do jail time for "attempted murder" and all because of some cheese? Not to mention he's gonna get ridiculed in jail over his crime.
The litmus test is a threat or actual harm to bodily integrity. In your opinion, did he suffer from either?I'm not askign your anything. You claimed it's not assualt where the girly shoves the guy. I'm saying you are wrong ito legal definitions of assault, no intent to do GBH is required.
As I said before, don't apply your theories to the law (much as I may agree).The litmus test is a threat or actual harm to bodily integrity. In your opinion, did he suffer from either?
GBH is merely an aggravated form of the same crime. It's irrelevant for our purposes here.
LOL There's only one thing I hate more than pineapple on a pizza and that's anchovies. Terrible. It permeates the whole pizza even if you take the anchovies off. Some people put an egg on pizza as well, couldn't imagine doing that either...I did a quick scan of 'pineapple' and guess I missed it.
I hereby forward all likes and brownie points in your direction.
BTW...I actually like pineapple on pizza, with bacon and garlic
Lol. That's a newspaper article. Besides, I'm not applying MY theories.As I said before, don't apply your theories to the law (much as I may agree).
Is that you Julius?
EFF leader Julius Malema says if he had assaulted the police officer who accused him of common assault, he would have "panelbeated" him. WATCH NOW.www.news24.com
That was also a shove ...
An injury or not is irrelevant.Lol. That's a newspaper article. Besides, I'm not applying MY theories.
I'll ask you again, iyo, did her motion for him to get out constitute an injury, or threat of imminent injury, to his bodily integrity? Yes or no? If yes, would his version be plausible to you if you were the judge, taking into account factors such as the demeanor and physique of the two involved.
I pointed out the definition. I also pointed out the SAPS page:the unlawful and intentional application of force to another person, or threatening that person with an application of force
You keep on insisting on a need for injury. There is no such a requirement. Essentially who touched who forcefully first is what matters, physique or being a d00s etc does not come into it. A deliberate shove/push qualifies. GBH is another form of assault. The are many forms of assault, some not even physical.Assault consists of unlawfully and intentionally
Assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. This is another form of assault, however, committed with the intention to cause serious bodily injury.
- applying force to the person of another;
- inspiring a belief in another person that force is immediately to be applied to him or her;
No argument and irrelevant. Feels does not come into it. As I said, I probably agree with your perception of the matter.Notwithstanding the fact that the dick had a loaded gun at his ready and she was in heels wearing a skimpy dress and looks no stronger than a twig. More so, it's clear her gesture was a motion for him to get out, as they were all shouting for him to. Not a motion to strike him down.
Yes or no?